🤑 Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity? – free-slots-money.website

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🖐

Filter:
Sort:
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Dear Free Mind Poet, Wow. Your “$$ Money $$” poem is great. I love the way make it clear that just about everybody is guilty of worshiping it to some degree (“You’re the child of Adam, so you’ve also taken’ a bite.”).


Enjoy!
$$ Money $$ - Free Minds Book Club & Writing Workshop
Valid for casinos
Get Free Money Fast: 16 Sites That Will Get You $2,100 (or MORE)
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
FREE MINDS - Pōhutukawa (Intro)

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

MIND OVER MONEY HOW TO PROGRAM YOUR. were programmed into our minds many years ago. The good news is that. Get 3 More Free Mind Power Tools with your free.


Enjoy!
$$ Money $$ - Free Minds Book Club & Writing Workshop
Valid for casinos
free-slots-money.website – Free Minds and Free Markets
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
There is much debate over what is REAL MONEY among American patriots and the debate has grown to encompass global aspects as the frauds of the monetary systems world-wide become more evident.
Even the well-meaning can lead you astray.
There are some things you should know before jumping in to "real money" offers or making the assumption that 'legal tender' is real money.
The governments, bankers, lawyers, the Crown, Federal Reserve System, the Rothschilds, the Bank of England and countless others hereafter the LIARS have gone to great lengths to define.
They have taught us through their government-controlled banking and government-controlled education systems that money is anything that people have trust in and is used for the exchange of goods and services.
History, however, does not define money in such simplistic, self-serving terms, as the LIARS want us to believe.
Money in its basest definition is value exchanged for equal or agreed-to value.
You work your butt off all week https://free-slots-money.website/and-money/bones-thugs-and-harmony-for-the-love-of-money.html you receive money in exchange for your labor.
Your labor was valuable to your employer and to your family.
You own title to your labor and you exchange your labor for title to something of equal or agreed-to value.
Prior to the 1900's - when a person received his pay - he received value for value.
You performed a hundred dollars worth of labor and received a hundred dollars of what?
For the convenience gold and silver was primarily used, but not always.
You could exchange your labor for food, for rent, for countless goods and services directly for your labor.
In a sense, those goods and services were money.
Gold, silver, bronze and other metal coins have been used 'as money' and 'for money' for thousands of years.
It was the historical demand of the worker which forced the governments and the employers to return something of equal value for the labor free minds and free money />Anything less is bordering on slavery.
These metals were and have always been in demand for industry, jewelry, etc.
The commodity exchange value of metals and other goods is a benchmark of the value of these items NOT COMMODITY PRICE.
It is evidence of the value of industrial demand versus supply of these goods.
Throughout history these metals have been the things MOST in demand and all other goods and services are valued by what is most in demand for industry.
Metals are expensive to find, process, and prepare for use, making their value even greater.
Precious metals have an intrinsic industrial demand and therefore have value.
Your labor is yours and yours alone.
You hold title or ownership of your labors, until you decide to exchange those labors for something else of determined value.
So to exchange the title of your labor for title i.
Gold, silver, platinum, palladium, bronze, and gems have traditionally met this criteria.
These items by themselves are useless to our everyday survival, but there is someone that is willing to pay or exchange to get those metals, giving them value.
When you have exchanged your labor for silver or gold coins, you have agreed to release title to your labor and received title to the coins.
The title of equal value remains yours.
When is 'money' not money?
Paper is what the LIARS want us to believe is money.
We have paper and it is money?
The LIARS have the gold, silver, platinum, palladium, and precious gems.
Regardless of the patriot slurs, paper does have intrinsic value and is not worthless.
So it has some intrinsic value.
Your value is just very low and I have reams of paper to pay you with.
When you accept paper in exchange for your labor you exchanged title to the value of your free minds and free money for something that has very little value.
History shows that government and bank paper is not something of great value.
The United States printed paper dollars in the 1700's called the continentals.
People accepted them for payment of their labors, but no one would exchange rent, food, beer, etc.
The people were not fooled into taking worthless paper for their labor.
They simply were not "worth a greenback.
The people preferred and continued to exchange in the money of Spain - gold and silver.
The early Texians like the U.
Americans were not stupid enough to accept something that was not worth their labor.
The government and the bankers did not pull the wool or paper over their eyes.
Germany did the same with the mark in the 1930-40's.
The workers finally quit taking play quiz and win money app worthless paper.
One reason that war was invoked was to resurrect an industry war industry to re-establish another one of the LIARS' failures.
Then enter the scams and the frauds - I mean bankers - LIARS.
The people were enticed and led to believe that paper backed by gold and silver was money.
So they began to trade their labors for certificates of gold and silver.
The gold and silver was in the banks and the certificate proved it!
Yes certificates did certify the gold and silver was in the bank.
The laborer had a certification that title to that amount of gold and silver existed.
However, he did NOT have title to the gold or silver.
He had a certificate that a title existed, but never did he get title to the gold or silver, nor was the title full ownership of the metal given to him.
The banker had title to the gold and silver you worked for and you had paper or proof that somewhere the gold and silver existed.
Soon the greedy banker LIAR had issued more paper certifying that more gold and silver existed than actually did exist.
He even pawned loaned the gold and silver he had certified existed at his bank and what you thought YOU had on deposit.
That was the banking panic of 1897, 1907 and 1929!
People started demanding the gold and silver for the paper and there simply was not enough gold and silver to cover the paper face amount.
The LIARS were caught in their LIES!
The people had accepted paper for their labor, instead of the ownership and title of the gold and silver.
It cost them dearly.
Federal Government, backed, supported, bankrolled, and became partners with the same people that had injured millions of their own citizens.
In fact, the people did not have ownership of the gold and silver in the banks with the certificates.
During 1929 through 1933, people had 'what they thought was money' on deposit and in savings accounts.
The banker LIARS foreclosed on the people's loans that the bankers had STOLEN from the people to begin with.
Even though the same people had 'money' in savings the LIAR bankers would not credit their loans from their savings.
They would foreclose on a thousand dollar loan when you had ten thousand dollars on deposit in the same bank and the LIARS would not let you have access to your funds.
Federal Government encouraged and enforced the bankers' frauds and rampage against the people.
The moral that the American people SHOULD have learned was NEVER lose title to your labor!
Never accept less than full title, and certificates gold and silver certificates ARE less than full title.
A certificate of a title IS NOT a TITLE!
There is a world of difference between a deposit receipt and a certificate of deposit.
There is a world of legal difference between a sales receipt a fraud and a bill of sale!
Paper representing someone's title to gold and silver is the way banking started.
Little scripts of paper, documented the title holder to a certain amount of gold or silver.
Holder bearer in due course of the script of paper had title and full ownership of the metal on deposit.
The banker had NO right or authority to any gold and silver that was stored with him.
He could not loan someone else's gold and silver!
He could not make interest money with YOUR gold and silver.
The gold and silver on deposit with him, represented by title script was NOT an asset, but a liability to the banker and on his bookkeeping, because it is money he owes the depositor or script holder.
The bank's income came from renting a https://free-slots-money.website/and-money/play-a-game-and-win-money.html space in his opinion take money and watch it burn яблочко a service fee.
During the depression, communities returned to the script method of banking in the South, and they were actually called 'scrip.
The worker could actually spend his scrip at local stores, by signing over his right to the silver the reptilian LIARS' kept the people from the goldand transferring title in the metal to the store owner.
Modern banking by the LIARS has everything turned around backwards.
This scam has been going on for over 70 years.
Your local friendly hometown banker is in actuality an agent and arm of the U.
Federal government, representing the interests of the Federal Reserve.
He is there to collect here notes!
A note is a simple contract evidencing a debt.
This was accomplished through a maze of corporate laws and a maze of banking laws and another maze of illegal codes and regulations.
Why are there no more private banks?
All banks are government controlled entities.
Every state government is a partner in this fraud.
They all have their hands in YOUR cookie jar.
They have taught and convinced the world- this is banking, when in reality it is THEFT.
Your deposits become their assets.
When you deposit you lose ALL rights and ownership of the funds, regardless of how little the intrinsic value of your deposit was.
They can tell you when and how and sometimes IF you can have access to your own money.
You lost title when you accepted a debt note for your labor, then deposited THEIR 'debt note funds' or 'legal tender', of which you never had full title to begin with!
You accepted something worth even less than paper money.
You accepted a debt note.
The debt is not your personal debt, but one the government LIARS owe to the banker LIARS.
The NOTE you carried and deposited was NEVER yours.
It is the LIARS' money play win online and quiz notes.
Look at an American Note dollar.
NO where does it say money on it.
It doesn't use the lawful two strike dollar symbol on it.
The government LIARS won't make that mistake.
The courts would rule against them.
It is a ONE Federal Reserve Note - not one dollar!
The words ONE DOLLAR is the amount the U.
This is 'legal tender' for all debts public and private.
IT is not money.
It was not intended to be money.
The debt referred to is the government's public and private not told to the public debt to the Bank of England and the Rothschilds, via their bastardized Federal Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service, the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International Settlements, and this list includes 99% of all banks, central banks, and taxing entities in the world.
There are two seals of two entities on the front of the ONE NOTE dollar?
One is the seal of the Treasury of the United States.
The other is the seal of the Federal Reserve.
Seals are used as signature for parties and entities representing more than one "live person" and are used in international commerce as signature seals.
To make a contract valid and the note enforceable in law, there must be signatures of two parties entering the contract.
Under the seal of the Federal Reserve, you can see the 'TREASURER' of the United States signed the note for the United States Treasury.
This is the treasurer's acknowledgement that the seal is accepted as legitimate.
Underneath the Treasury seal, the Secretary of the Treasury has signed, thus giving his acceptance of that being the legal seal of the Treasury.
Note: the Treasurer has accepted the Federal Reserve seal as legitimate and the Secretary of the Treasury accepted the Treasury seal.
Who does the Secretary of the Treasury work for?
THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!
The Secretary of the Treasury is NOT a lawful or constitutional position.
The constitution and laws placing the constitution into effect only provided for the Treasurer.
The Secretary of the Treasury is NOT a government, at least not a lawful occupation or position.
Does this picture become clearer?
You are exchanging your hard work for someone else's debt!
Not to worry though, you can exchange the debt at the company store and if you are fast enough the value won't change too drastically before you get there.
This is why your deposit at the bank becomes the LIARS' asset!
You reduced HIS debt!
It's simple balance sheet bookkeeping.
Tired of this SCAM and FRAUD?
Every congressman, senator, president, judge, governor, attorney general, IRS agent, etc.
The Rothschilds own most of the platinum on the face of the earth.
They stole it by stealing your labors.
When you buy a car there is a catalytic converter on it.
It has a small amount of platinum inside the converter.
When the catalytic converter wears out, like a muffler, you have to replace it.
It costs about a hundred ONE FRN's Federal Reserve Notes - dollars?
You can get your old muffler back.
Try getting your old catalytic converter!.
They won't let you have it.
The platinum is reclaimed and sent to ROTHSCHILD owned warehouses.
You are paying for the same platinum over and over and over.
YOU never had title to the converter.
You never free minds and free money title to the car!
You had a certificate of title.
If we can ever right the money wrongs being perpetrated by the reptilian LIARS, we have to stop accepting their debt notes for our labor - BEFORE their fraudulent system fails.
It's a natural end result of LIES.
The current system is overdue for failure and it free minds and free money taken hook and crook to keep it sustained for this long.
We have to demand value for our labor and preserve the title to the value of our labor.
Right now we are simply selling ourselves, not just short, but for negative credits.
Real money must preserve and guarantee the true title and ownership of the labor.
If not, you are at their mercy.
Commodities are materials placed on the market for industry and it is one thousand percent controlled by the LIARS.
If you purchase gold and silver with debt notes of the Federal Reserve then THEY OWN the gold and silver you thought you purchased.
You cannot buy gold and silver 'as money.
If gold and silver is money then it must be exchanged at an exchange rate.
However, if you exchanged the trading unit of a government USD?
Nations are sovereign to themselves and they do NOT buy other money.
They exchange money on a value-based exchange rate.
If we as humans are sovereign then we must do the same when dealing with another sovereign entity.
We are NOT in the market to purchase metal for industrial use.
We MIGHT be in the market to sell to industrial needs.
Many can remember Granny saying, "I used to buy six loaves of bread for a dollar.
In 1950 the dollars were still based on silver.
In reality, the vehicle cost much less than in the 1950's, because look at how much MORE car and technical improvements you get with the SAME amount of silver.
The price and value have NOT risen.
Only the number of fraudulent debt notes being used as money.
Things of value remain virtually the same value at all times.
The only things changing are the DEBT NOTES which are controlled by the creators of the debt and the bankers - THE LIARS' CLUB.
It's their insanity game and we have to get out of the game.
This is why it is critical to you and I to preserve title to our labor and title to what we exchange for our labor.
Paper can be 'as money'.
Debt notes can be used 'as money,' but for the humans doing all the labor it is a very dangerous game to be in.
Gold and silver are not the only things of value that can be used for money, but these metals are recognizable and are convenient for most people.
By Lauren Savage Taken from: In October 2018, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia began its prosecution of the prominent Islamic researcher, Sheikh Hassan al-Maliki, in the Specialized Criminal Court in Riyadh, which was specially established in January 2009 to handle cases of terrorism and national securi Every year, a common occurrence is a dispute between followers of various sects about when so-called Ramadan starts and ends.
This year is no exception and some countries ended their so-called Ramadan one day before others.

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

We've worked our socks off to develop a platform that allows anyone, including international users, to earn free money online. In an age where Adblock adoption is spreading exponentially, it's becoming increasingly more difficult for advertisers to reach their intended audience with traditional advertising methods.


Enjoy!
Get Free Money Fast: 16 Sites That Will Get You $2,100 (or MORE)
Valid for casinos
Financial Advice - Money Minds
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Reks and Hazardis Soundz - Free Minds Ft Ezdread

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Get Free Money From Acorns Found Money & Boost Your Savings. Did someone say free money? Yeah. that was our own Stephen Pepper calling. He’s found a number of Acorns “found money” options that don’t require a purchase. Sure, each offer will take a couple of minutes of your time to complete, but they won’t cost you a dime — rather.


Enjoy!
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity? – free-slots-money.website
Valid for casinos
Freed Finances - Free Your Money Free Your Mind!
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
free minds and free money

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

[PDF]Free Minds Markets And Money download Book Minds Markets And Money.pdf FREE DOWNLOAD, MINDS MARKETS AND MONEY PDF related documents: Teachers Curriculum Institute Monsoon Asia Answers Unit 14countries Of The World Answer Key Topical Review Book Company Answer Key Algebra 2 Trigonometry Tet Answer Sheet


Enjoy!
$$ Money $$ - Free Minds Book Club & Writing Workshop
Valid for casinos
MoneyMindz - India's First Free On-Call Financial Advisory
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity?
A baker's dozen Christian libertarians weigh in 10.
Over the last year, I've spoken with countless practicing Christians who also fall into what might be called the small- l libertarian camp.
A few prefer "classical liberal" while others identify as full-on anarcho-capitalists.
Many work in the so-called liberty movement, but there were also business owners and writers, musicians and scientists, scholars and priests.
Virtually all see markets, largely or entirely unfettered by the state, as the best mechanism we have for empowering humans to grow and thrive.
I asked them to explain, in their own words, how they manage to reconcile two worldviews that many would have us believe are hopelessly in conflict.
Below is a sampling of what I heard.
Capitalism simply means the freedom of individuals to make contracts and to engage others in a peaceful and voluntary way.
That's precisely what Christ taught.
Reed, president of the Foundation for Economic Education and author of "If someone says to you 'be my friend' and points a gun to you, that is not a good start of a relationship.
God offers us his friendship.
We have a choice to respond or not.
But if it's to make any sense, it has to be free.
You have to be able to say yes and you have to be able to say no.
And here is the really interesting thing: God will respect your decision even when he knows it's not a good idea.
So God, who owns us twice over, and who in a 'my house, my rules' way has the right, if anyone has the right, to tell us what we may and may not do and indeed to force us not to do it—if he's not willing to do that, how can anyone have the right to do it?
I would argue that earthly government is the last thing I should be supporting as a Christian.
And that needs to be the goal.
I think Christians and non-Christians alike can agree: We should help people who are marginalized.
But the question is, OK, how do you do that?
If you look at the church and nonprofit organizations, combined with a really thriving economy, you have the best antidote to long-term poverty that we've ever known.
It really was only in the modern world, with the Enlightenment, when you developed a naturalist group that broke off from the natural law tradition and were advocating liberty based on utilitarian arguments.
And that idea is not Catholic.
The first people to act on behalf of the vulnerable should be individuals, acting as neighbors, acting in communities.
How's that for something that's antithetical to the Christian faith?
Robert Sirico, a Catholic priest and president of Acton Institute "The more I read, the more I realized that there's nowhere in here where Christ attempts to use the tools of violence to accomplish his objectives.
In fact, it was so extreme in the opposite direction that even self-defense wasn't used by Christ and the early Christians.
It started to solidify for me that genuine Christianity is absolutely the opposite of all things political.
You can't enforce the ideas and morals of the kingdom of God with the kingdom of men, which is violence.
The question is whether or not we're willing to empower a third party to interfere with people who would prefer to walk away quiz win money app something they find objectionable.
I'd prefer not to casino scratch and win real money no deposit that interference—in the lives of religious people or anyone else.
Brown, host of the and a Quaker convert "Christianity has a lot to say about how we treat those who are in need, those who are less fortunate.
Not just in terms of their material standard of living, but in terms of their political prospects, in terms of their social standing, and in terms of their ability to take control of their lives in fundamental and important ways.
I don't think that's what the Bible told us.
The Bible says to develop our talents to the maximum capacity, and to be compassionate to our fellow man.
Those individuals are developing themselves, they're developing the company and the schools we manage, and by doing that they're making this huge contribution to the world and to everybody they touch.
Because that's where we have an opportunity to develop ourselves.
This is consistent with libertarianism??.?
Catholicism has two flags: the papal flag, and the black flag of anarchy!
Tucker, director of content at the Foundation for Economic Education and creator of liberty.
What's un-Christian about that?
The Golden Rule states, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
The non-aggression principle states, Don't do to other people what you don't want done to you.
Call it the negative corollary.
We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them.
Comments do not represent the views of Reason.
We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
Senator Bin Laden might really fuck things up for you….
Start working at home with Google!
I work through this young and the game, go?
Although, at or money no deal deal win online play and real point, neither is Bin Laden.
But his pals will.
Why would you suicide bomb something when you have the power of a senator?
What I do see, are many religious people disparaging libertarians, usually for their lack of understanding of libertarian beliefs, or their false belief that none of them believe in God.
And then occasionally I see someone claiming libertarians disparage Christianity like you Elias.
Frankly Free minds and free money find Christianity very libertarian.
Neither Christians or libertarians believe in initiating force against others.
Because your extremism is surely the correct one.
Our morality is the correct one.
If prohibiting 100% the initiatory use of force is extreme so be it.
Unless someone steps on your lawn, then you can initiate force against them, for some reason.
These things are so confusing.
Almost as if they make no goddamn sense.
Defending your property rights is retaliatory not initiatory.
Yes trespassing is a form of initiatory force.
You believe people should be allowed to initiate force if they work for the government.
And trespass is just a synonym for violation.
Definition: laissez-faire — abstention by governments from interfering in the workings of the free market.
America was founded on the principle of individual liberty and that government is, at best, a necessary evil and must be restrained for the good of the American People.
Which is what we have now.
So they mostly run around writing tickets.
See Tara Smith Well, everything other than that violates the NAP.
You do understand that you are arguing FOR visit web page right?
The question is whether you are more motivated than other extremists.
How many buildings have you bombed?
So you think that not initiating force against other humans is an extreme position?
You advocate for immorality.
You should at least warn your neighbors… They have a right to know who you are.
Well what have we been arguing about all this time?
And the boys down at the playground are playing hard to get.
Yeah, because thinking that the government should not tell a construction business what height ladder to use is extreme.
That means you better love taxes and do as your told, moron.
Romans 13 is why Christianity is incompatible with libertarianism.
For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.
Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority?
But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain.
Also, true Christians love the Trump administration.
Read Revelation or James and it is clear that you need both faith and deeds to pass judgment.
The death bed confession is a catholic thing.
How could a Christian be a libertarian without actively rebelling against and dispobeyjng the state?
Well, for example, if he lives in a libertarian state.
Non-christians trying to explain Christian practice.
Paul was told to renounce Christianity and was killed by the civil government.
Obviously, when Paul enjoins us to be good citizens, there are limits.
Martin Luther King Jr.
MLK Jr accepted the civil consequences of his actions and his subsequent arrest and famous letter from a Birmingham jail.
What can be said from Romans 13 is that Paul approves of a minarchist watch-dog state.
Notice the conditional nature of the end of this pericope a set of verses that forms one coherent unit or thought, suitable for public reading from a text, now usually of scripture.
Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.
Have they given you value, that is goods and services, and mutual respect and honor?
BTW one more reason to get into crypto-coins.
If there are limits, what are those limits and where are they stated?
Because the Bible is the infallible word-of-God.
And your MLK anecdote?
The Old Testament is a collection of writings put together by Jewish rabbis and scribes.
The New Testament is four condensed oral histories of Jesus and a series of letter by the earliest Church fathers trying to navigate between the Jewish authorities and the Roman authorities to make sure the memory of Jesus survived the century.
I will not, for example, try to reconcile why Paul saw fit to let Gentiles eat pork, but not for male Gentiles to lay with other male Gentiles, but will accept that a mortal did his best to hold the newborn church together and his own judgments may have affected how he did so.
That said, we are given the free will to accept or reject Christ and to do good or bad deeds while accepting the consequences.
This is as libertarian as you get: You makes your choices and you takes your chances.
It is disturbing the degree to which all this got perverted when Constantine and the Catholic Church tried to harness each other to their respective causes.
I agree with your analysis of that passage.
And I agree that Catholicism conflicts with libertarianism.
He says lots of things that are not consistent with what Jesus actually said.
Recall that Paul was a persecuter by nature and not one of the original 12.
What is strange is that this was written in an era when the Roman Empire and Christianity were at odds.
It is more of an endorsement that matters of politics and matters of faith are separate categories.
Obedience to Free minds and free money is not necessarily obedience to secular authority.
Taxation is a worldly concern, and is a thing of this world.
The passage makes them explicitly separate things.
Even a squish theological liberal like Jefferson believed in a creator God who is the source of our rights.
Does Jefferson have to leave behind his belief in inalienable rights with which we are endowed by our Creator?
To be fair, science has accomplished much since Jefferson was alive.
Darwin published in 1859.
Big Bang was theorized in the 20th century.
Jefferson died in 1826.
He was simply more concerned with THIS world and how article source improve life here.
My point was that the majority view in the late 18th century was that there must be a god of some sort because there were no credible scientific theories to explain the origin of Man or the universe.
To say that men are endowed by their creator in the 18th century is really saying these are natural rights.
The creator of some sort being nothing more than the most accepted theory of the origin of man at that time.
Well something has to exist outside the confines of time and space to create the universe.
Well something has to exist outside the confines of time and space to create the universe Citation needed.
If the universe spontaneously created itself from nothing then it becomes by definition god itself, existing without beginning and operating outside of itself.
It should be very easy for you.
Jefferson would have been plenty well acquainted enough with the concepts in his time to have chosen a different phraseology had he so desired.
The Samaritan then starts waylaying people himself, taking their shekels to clothe, feed and get medical help to take money and watch burn mugged guy.
Luke 16-24New Living Translation NLT Parable of the Shrewd Manager ….
The point is that even a selfish person can realize that forgiveness makes the world a better place for himself as well as those forgiven.
The forgiveness was widespread because the manager did not know who he would need to turn to.
There is no taxation, or redistribution in the parable.
No totalitarian state or community ownership of the means of production.
A better text for communism might be the early church in Jerusalem in the first years after Pentecost.
Acts Ch 1-5 approximately.
Even there private property was respected.
No one was compelled to give to the common purse.
I think Jesus makes several comments about voluntarily giving money as opposed to having it taken from you.
I like your post Darth.
The good Samaritan helped keep a guy from dying.
But how much do you think that poor guy felt the help was worth?
Seems to me good Catholics can handle being as generous as the good Samaritan to those whom they believe need help, without asking the government to harm others to do it for them.
The Bible is the story of failed organizations.
Whether it is Jewish kingdoms or synagogues, the story is the same.
Human organizations inevitably fall prey to corruption.
Why would a Christian want to empower them?
One can argue that means that things like civil liberties are religiously irrelevant too — the cop who martyrs you is just speeding you to paradise, while he and his masters will have their own scores to settle with the almighty.
But others focus more on the need to do good where possible without assuming they need to create a theocracy for Christ to come back.
Some folks get some serious stuff backwards.
Why would a Christian want to empower them?
It is the doctrine of total depravity.
As Paul puts it: — 15 I do not understand what I do.
For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do.
It was the Christian idea of the depravity of man that led the founding fathers to split powers of government and impose checks and balances.
Total depravity of Man is a totally depraved doctrine of a minority of Christians.
Most of the Founding Fathers believed that human beings were endowed with RIGHTS, and that the purpose of government was to secure theses rights, not to make sure these depraved humans stayed in line.
Religious faith and religious institutions are essential to a workable stateless society.
Atheism presents problems, however.
I think they follow a dual supply form of ecclesiology church doctrine.
You can have your chicken and eat it too.
Perhaps why chicken for Sunday dinner is called the sacred bird?
Translation: mystical bigots call freethinkers a-theists believers in nothing whatsoever.
Believers in torture and murder for superstition they define as normal, regular Volk, as in 1930s Germany.
They worshipped the state.
Hitler was an Atheist, anti-smoking, vegetarian dog-lover who supported war and mass murder, a typical Atheist.
Hitler was a believer when it suited him, and an un-believer when it suited him… Like maybe EVERY politician who has ever lived?
For example Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German pastor, theologian, spy, anti-Nazi dissident, and key founding member of the Confessing Church.
Later he was transferred to a Nazi concentration camp.
After being accused of being associated with the plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler, he was quickly tried, along with other accused plotters, including former members of the Abwehr the German Military Intelligence Officeand then executed by hanging on 9 April 1945 as the Nazi regime was collapsing.
Brave man and amazing thinker.
He challenges Christians to abandon complancency to their own mediocrity and to injustice around them.
Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession…Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German pastor, theologian, spy, anti-Nazi dissident, and key founding member of the Confessing Church.
In contrast, the Catholic church chose to collaborate with the regime in return for financial and political benefits despite having the same understanding of the moral evil that Nazism represented as Bonhoeffer.
That is what makes the actions of the Catholic church so morally reprehensible and why the Catholic church bears part of the blame for the crimes and deaths of the Nazi regime.
Including the wholesale slaughter of Catholic clergy at the death camps?
Ooops, you were being a historically illiterate fuckstain again.
Hitler was an Atheist, anti-smoking, vegetarian dog-lover who supported war and mass murder, a typical Atheist.
In addition, the Catholic church also supported war and mass murder throughout its history.
The Catholic church in Germany was simply one of many organizations that failed to do the morally right thing.
However, in the case of the Catholic church, this is particularly damning, since it means that as a moral authority, they are no better than the German dog breeders where Hitler got his dogs.
The country whose intelligentsia explicated nihilism as a philosophy 50 years earlier, culminating in the ascendancy of a genocidal maniac under their banner and the persecution and genocide of Christians and Jews.
Nope, clearly Germany was not secular in the 1930s.
If the supreme God had wanted us to be socialists, true believers would have no choice but to be socialists.
But I doubt very much that God wants us to be socialists.
If He wanted us to be socialists, why did he give us brains?
Not to mention commandments about the dignity of the individual person, prohibitions on theft, etc.
It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
Nothing in the sentence you reference is incompatible with full-blown atheism.
Both were already in circulation at the time, not necessarily by atheists per se, but by those who explicitly excluded religious arguments from their case.
But I doubt it.
Since there is zero evidence for any being of that sort, I guess we have to trash the whole thing, right?
Further, who said the DoI is the source of libertarian thought?
By all means scrap the Declaration and come up with an alternate rationale.
It would be too bad, though — the American founders gave us such an excellent rationale for liberty — but if the fight against fundamentalism requires that we ditch that rationale and find a new one, so be it, I guess… What a ridiculous strawman.
The only one claiming that atheists have to reject the DoI is you.
In a way that Jefferson himself would have been rather peeved by, given his other beliefs and commitments.
Christians would have an easier time under a libertarian government than a libertarian would have under a Christian government.
Historically, there is no iota of evidence for the existence of a Jesus-Prophet.
For starters, William Dean Howells and Edward Bellamy.
They translated Marxist Red Republicanism into Bryanistic Christian Communism.
If the shoe fits, wear it.
I myself was surprised to learn that communism is another altruist religion, but once you replace decapitated, burnt saints bristling with arrows with bureaucrats on the outs and the the more modern methods of torture, it fits.
Observe that both value something that lies on the other side of death.
But surprise is a natural consequence of blind, ignorant superstition even today.
There is far more evidence for Jesus than Julius Caesar, Socrates, Shakespeare, and on and on.
And then we go all Godwin: The Christian National Socialist Germany???
Read the Bible and you will find nothing about exterminating other races.
Who cares how Ayn Rand interpreted an old movie?
There is not one bit of evidence for a junior.
The biblical texts are themselves wonderful evidence that non-Christians have thoroughly studied using standard historical techniques.
But there are significant non-Christian sources as well.
AD 116book 15, chapter 44.
You find a couple of naive Christians who advocate socialism as the most Christian form of governing.
You then jump to the conclusion that Ceau?
The Catholic Church is anti-abortion.
It never occurred to you that Ceau?
This is beyond retarded.
Ceausescu was a lifelong atheist he sang the international Socialist song at his execution, instead of praying and he demolished a lot of churches — including many historical ones.
His regime persecuted Christians and fucked with them in the most petty ways — making people go to work on major holidays Easter, etc.
The Bible was written by human beings, human beings make mistakes.
Or your soul will burn in hell!
Basically removing the hocus pocus in the scripture of the day.
See: The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth.
Jefferson also believed that our rights are God-given.
Maybe his Christianity was too watered-down to count as Christianity, but his theism was clear.
It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?
Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever: that considering numbers, nature and natural means only, a revolution of the wheel of fortune, money and poker chips exchange of situation, is among possible events: that it may become probable by supernatural interference!
The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in such a contest.
Simple — by the standards of his own day Jefferson was a theological liberal, a skeptic, etc.
Secularism, or humanism, you could ask that question of, but neither is the same thing as atheism.
Atheism denotes nothing more than lack of belief in the existence of deities.
You might as well ask if libertarianism is compatible with hats, or oranges.
Jefferson was a deist heavily influenced by Christianity.
Was Jefferson an atheist?
Did Jefferson condemn atheism as being incompatible with his notion of individual rights?
Paine was widely accused of atheism and was much closer to it than other contemporary deists.
Whether or not he actually was by modern definitions is beside the point, the allegation was debated and discussed in those terms.
But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them.
The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit.
We are answerable for them to our God.
The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others.
But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god.
It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
If it be said, his testimony in a court of justice cannot be relied on, reject it then, and be the stigma on him.
Constraint may make him worse by making him a hypocrite, but it will never make him a truer man.
It may fix him obstinately in his errors, but will not cure them.
Reason and free enquiry are the only effectual agents against error.
Give a loose to them, they will support the true religion, by bringing every false one to their tribunal, to the test of their investigation.
They are the natural enemies of error, and of error only.
All of this evades the simple question: what is a right?
Did ANYONE here take ethics in college?
Read a Tara Smith book?
Atheists can, and many do, accept the notion of inherent rights that attach by consequence of human nature.
Rights are a utilitarian construct designed by man in response to empirical observation of the consistently negative outcomes of aggression and the managerial failings of the State.
If in fact there are a hundred or so papists with weakened reality control able to vote libertarian, the LP should welcome their support for our platform and candidates.
Stephanie is a perfect candidate Fifth Columnist to turn the LP into another Tea Party, exactly the way the Greens and CPUSA wish it would turn.
John Hospers and Tonie Nathan turned the LP platform into Roe v.
But Canada has since become a Sanctuary State for women formerly abused by coercive mystical altruism.
For women who vote with their feet, Canada is the 1 choice for evading conscription into Islamic or National Socialist milch cow womanhood.
money and beer at the immigration demographics.
Yeah Hank, we get it.
You hate religion, and religious people.
You also like to construct these bizarre, obscure, overly com0,ex false arguments as to why people of faith are icky.
Which really, makes you the bigot at the end of the day.
The Lateran Treaties are what you are looking for.
WordPress is a blog platform, not an index you fucking halfwit.
And if we wanted to read your delusional rantings on your personal blog we could follow the link in your profile.
And that 98% figure is a fabrication from whole cloth.
If Christians have to own Hitler based on your lies, you can own Stalin based on the truth.
And he will appoint for himself commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots.
He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers.
He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his servants.
He will take the tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his officers and to his servants.
He will take your male servants and female servants and the best of your young men and your donkeys, and put them to his work.
He will take the tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves.
And in that day you will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.
And he will appoint for himself commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots.
He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers.
He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his servants.
He will take the tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his officers and to his servants.
He will take your male servants and female servants and the best of your young men and your donkeys, and put them to his work.
He will take the tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves.
And in that day you will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.
This is in fact true.
The Non-Aggression Principle Republican fascisti struggle to evade was formulated in 1947, alongside Chapter 10 of Atlas Shrugged.
It only looked, goosestepped and quacked like it.
But objectivist scholars do not insist on laws to punish people who commit suicide.
That was the jurisdictional province of East Germany once International Socialism had replaced National Socialism over there.
Objectivists are about a life worth living.
Freedom from establishment and free exercise are Protestant concepts.
We inherited them from the Peace of Westphalia.
Once it became clear that the religion of the emperor no longer determined the religion of the princes and that people were free to choose their own religion regardless of the religion of the princes, too, murdering each other over the question of who the prince and the emperor should be based on their religion became an unnecessary.
That worked out so well, Madison incorporated it into the First Amendment as such.
In fact, Madison credited Martin Luther with showing us the way on religious freedom.
Thank Calvinism for American capitalism—sure, why not?
Good ideas are good regardless of their source.
It illustrates the excellence of a system which, by a due distinction, to which the genius and courage of Game play win money and a led the way, between what is due to Caesar and what is due God, best promotes source discharge of both obligations.
The experience of the United States is a happy disproof of the error so long rooted in the unenlightened minds of well-meaning Christians, as well as in the corrupt hearts of persecuting usurpers, that without a legal and quotes money msn stock of religious and civil polity, neither could be supported.
A mutual independence is found most friendly to practical Religion, to social harmony, and to political prosperity.
Religious freedom for the unfavored religion could be exercised by moving to the country of a more sympathetic ruler.
As far as I can make out from the flow of words, the Lutherans were establishing a congregation with English-language services, which seems to have been a matter of some controversy with the German-speakers.
First Amendment freedom of religion is a point of Protestant doctrine.
Of these that of the priests is the more weighty, since they have to render an account for even the kings of men in the divine judgment.
You are also aware, dear son, that while you are permitted honorably to rule over human kind, yet in things divine you bow your head humbly before the leaders of the clergy and await from their hands the means of your salvation….
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
GAWD does love me, yes indeed, Keeps me safe, and gives me feed, Shelters me from bad drugs and weed, And gives me all that I might need!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
DEA, CIA, KGB, Our protectors, they will be, FBI, TSA, and FDA, With us, astride us, in every way!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
When the Muslim armies first overran what is now Iran, the people there were predominantly Zoroastrian.
Over the ensuing decades, many of them wanted to convert to Islam, but their Muslim conquerors needed them to pay the tax on non-Muslims.
So, they did a few things.
I maintain that our rights are natural for a number of reasons.
For one, they arise naturally as an aspect of our agency and, for another, violating them tends to have the same kinds of negative consequences in the natural world across all cultures and throughout history.
Communism ended up on the ash heap of history for similar reasons.
I appreciate that there were antecedents before Luther.
The Golden Rule permeates our culture even LGBT atheists will argue that they should be treated the read article others would want to be treated if others were them because it came to us by way of Christianity—not because it came to us by way of Zoroastrianism, the Vedic tradition, or somewhere else.
Luther lived in a time and place, and he was influenced by things he was exposed to in the real world.
That being said, the separation of church and state was a Protestant concept and it came to American culture and institutions by way of the Reformation and radical Protestants.
Thank the Reformation and radical Protestants.
I would agree that America was a Protestant country at the time of the founding not 100%, but culturally Protestant and would not have accepted an idea which they considered to be of purely non-Protestant origin.
I meant to say that freedom of religion as we have it in the First Amendment came from Protestant ideas.
In fact, James Madison, the author of the First Amendment, credited Martin Luther with showing us the way.
And why should that attribution be resisted?
Good ideas come from wherever you find them.
Westphalian principles let the princes determine their own religion in their own principalities—without interference from the emperor—and it let individuals within each principality choose their own faith—be it Catholic, Lutheran, or Calvinism.
I might add that when the history of ISIS is written, their failures may correctly be blamed on the failure to adhere to this principle.
In fairness we should probably admit that freedom of religion means freedom of Christianity.
The counterpoint was Ben Franklin used an example of a Mufti preaching in a public space but I think that was hypothetical.
And yet the first British colony in America to have any kind of religious tolerance was the Catholic colony of Maryland.
If you were a believer in the Trinity, you could freely practice your faith there, meaning it excluded Jews and Muslims.
Martin Luther simply broke up the monopoly the Roman Catholic Church had on western Europe.
Roger Williams founded Rhode Island as a refuge for religious dissenters against the Puritans only four years after Maryland received its charter.
Both were founded before the Peace of Westphalia.
Religious wars and their causes were a hot topic at the time.
Even the believer Erhman Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew admits that.
Eric July is a Hoppean nutter.
His Christianity might not be incompatible with libertarianism, but his actual political views sure are.
Some of these people have very strange, non-biblical ideas of Christianity.
God offers us his friendship.
We have a choice to respond or not.
I wish there were a way I could stop that.
He absolutely used violence to do that.
What was Sodom and Gomorrah?
What was the flood?
What were the various genocides God commanded the Israelites to carry out?
If you want to include turning over the tables of the money changers then I think we have dumbed down violence to a pretty low level.
The Bible illustrates some pretty harsh collective punishments meted out by God.
In fact, Jesus even explains that though God will channel your wickedness to His own ends, you will still be held personally accountable.
He was speaking specifically to the example of Judas.
Without Judas there is no crucifixion, yet this is no excuse for his betrayal.
It ignores cause and effect.
And God specifically told the Israelites it was okay for them to commit genocide.
Funny, but not one of these actually says that.
You should submit your translation indicating where all others were remiss.
I wish there were a way I could stop that.
God is not holding a gun to your head, but there are consequences, just like anything.
The gun just happens to be floating there, controlled by no one.
Hell is just a thing that happens!
The whole point of the gun to your head analogy is that God is like a mugger with a gun.
This is no different than the threat of Hell.
God gives you the option of disobeying, but with the understanding that He will condemn you to eternal torment if you do.
An eternity in Hell for acts committed in the 80 or less years we have on Earth always seemed a little harsh to me.
It is not a gun.
It is a door, and you choose to walk out of it or not by your actions and to stay out by not repenting actions that separate you from God.
Hell is not a fire pit with goat-like creatures poking you with sticks.
Depends on your version of Christianity.
Some think of hell as you describe.
Christianity is all about free will and choice.
Christianity is about freedom via the correct operation of precise spiritual wisdom by the LIVING example of Jesus Of Nazareth, called I-AM-ness.
Answer me THAT one!
The Cleansing of the Temple?
Do your best to make the world a better place at the local level.
Sounded pretty libertarian to me.
The problem with religion is that it has been one of the largest excuses for more violations of the NAP throughout nearly all of modern history.
Well this book says I should kill you.
You want to put this substance in your body?
Sorry my twisted view of this text says you should go to jail so I can save your soul.
These are about the most un-libertarian positions one can have.
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!!
Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE Romans 3:10.
So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything.
And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses!
All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses.
I am sure I will find it soon!
It has little if anything to do with being a scriptural literalist.
It has to do with loving your neighbor… I thought militant atheism was one of the largest excuses for more violations of the NAP throughout nearly all of modern history.
The Bolsheviks, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and other cheerful types created a whole lot more mayhem than all the Christians combined in modern history.
Their seething hatred was unmatched by the most rigid Christians.
Atheism was incidental to it, as evidenced by how important the Orthodox Church was to Stalin when he found it convenient.
There were and are plenty of Christian Socialists, and Marxists, and Fascists, just as there are atheist versions of all of them.
From Wikipedia, which leads me to believe that the anti-Christian sentiment was hardly incidental: The League of Militant Atheists aided the Soviet government in killing clergy and committed believers.
Between 1927 and 1940, the number of Orthodox churches in the Russian Republic fell from 29,584 to fewer than 500.
During the purges of 1937 and 1938, church documents record that 168,300 Russian Orthodox clergy were arrested.
Of these, over 100,000 were shot.
Despite complaints, even by APL members, all churches, mosques, monasteries, and other religious institutions were either closed down or converted into warehouses, gymnasiums, or workshops by the end of 1967.
In parallel, a Soviet-style purge campaign was launched in the Communist Party and the Mongolian army.
The Mongol leader at that time was Khorloogiin Choibalsan, follower of Joseph Stalin, who emulated many of the policies that Stalin developed in the Soviet Union.
The purges succeeded in virtually eliminating Lamaism and cost an estimated thirty to thirty-five thousand lives You get the idea.
Atheism was one of free minds and free money main goals of communism perhaps the main goal, according to some thinkers and it was often brutally implemented.
Even rival brands of Marxism were an intolerable threat to the regime: look at the hatred between Leninists and Maoists, and Void help the Trotskyites.
The same No True Scotsman cop out could be use by Christians to dodge the original charge as well.
Which is kind of the point.
But I was never asserting that: only that I had never heard of it being done.
Whereas there have been plenty of genocides perpetrated avowedly for the cause of Christ.
Atheism is a weapon for non-theist religions, but rarely free minds and free money it a religion by itself.
Voluntary altruism is precious, and should be treasured and honored.
I think she saw it as counter-productive.
As for the tenants of classic Christianity, who were they?
The monks living in hollowed out caves?
The First Commandment clashes with the First Amendment A better article would be more detailed about WHICH Christian denomination is compatible with libertarian ideals, and then to focus on the Free minds and free money libertarian of them all, which would surprise many to be the AMISH.
Many Leftists use the Amish as an example of the perfect SOCIALIST society, but in fact the Amish are a perfect example of a more libertarian or Arden, Delaware type community.
As a semi-expert on their faith, I know that the Amish basically leave each other alone except for when there is dire need.
Even the Amish in modern America are more tolerant and moderate than the SJWs and Muslims.
But even if you did, libertarianism is fortunate enough to have the market as just such a mechanism.
It is, indeed, impossible to have a libertarian society whilst forcing people to associate with one another against their will.
Which is a desirable feature to totalitarian stains on humanity like you.
The people of Israel and Judea, celebrating Sabbath, screamed for His crucifixion, as Roman Pilate washed his hands in innocence.
Is Christianity compatible with Libertarianism?
Fortunately, some Christians have learned to justify those parts into irrelevancy or flat-out ignore them.
But any literal interpretation?
Word salad is a hallmark of charlatanry.
The drivel you just free minds and free money looks like it was generated by a bot running on 8086 hardware, or a Management undergraduate.
I was an atheist for the first half of my life on pretty much the same grounds as Ayn Rand and George H.
Then I had a series of experiences that satisfied my rational skepticism and convinced me of the existence of God.
These were not religious experiences because they were not based on dogma, scripture, or accepting anything on faith.
When I was an atheist I was a libertarian.
Now that I view God as a real existent I am still a libertarian.
So I am chagrined that Reason magazine feels it necessary to question whether a particular religion, Christianity, is compatible with libertarianism.
The right question is whether one can both affirm the existence of God and accept libertarian principles.
Is Christianity compatible with libertarianism in its current, powerless-to-set-heretics-on-fire form?
Sure, why not… same with other popular works of fiction, like Harry Potter or Spider-man.
Yahweh; one of the lietmotifs of the Old Nonsense is that any time Yahweh changes his mind, large numbers of things die.
At the end of the day, the Jeebus death-porn cult is going the way of all religions.
Seems similar to the Priestly money-changers-money-lenders and todays Fed Banking Cartel the famous Rabbi discovered in the Temple and ended with his execution.
May I just say that, reading the click to see more on this blog is so refreshing!
As an old Ayn Rand Objectivist, I am upset constantly by the slander and vulgar name-calling of other sites with no resolution.
I thought Reason could not do an objective, calm discourse on religion, but it has!
And it is wonderful.
I have learned so much and feel I have found my home for talking and learning.
He was starting a rebellion among the people in Judea.
This rebellion would bring the Roman Legions and possibly threaten the Priests.
It was the Priests that convinced the Roman Governor to execute the rebel Rabbi.
If the State was the Roman Empire then rather than the State… it seems the corrupt Priests were responsible for the crucifixion.
Somewhat similar to a corporate lobbyist bribing a few members of Congress to pass a law that favors the corporation.
Jesus was an enemy of the state and its taxes.
That is why the chief tax collector for Judea, P.
Christianity is absolutely not compatible with the Libertarian Party and its mouthpieces like this website.
Mentally deranged party acolytes like Hank Phillips and Sevo above being prime examples.
Hard for a religion to be compatible with a political party when the political party requires forcing people to violate the tenets of their religion.
The question I had to ask myself before going further was: Would I want someone like here in office?
No, I would not.
He was a real Libertarian.
He makes the case for the KJV distorting the chapter to endorse statism, when it does nothing of the kind.
The breaking of the seal on His tomb was an act against the State, in and of it self.
Jesus was the first nonviolent voluntaryist and illegal-tax protester.
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity?
Our company has an extensive list on medications and can provide all shipping options like Regular post, EMS, DHL.
Xanax ,Opana ,Percocet ,methadone ,Amphetamine ,Mephedrone ,Nembutal Pentobarbital,Actavis promethazine codeine ,Medical Marijuana ,Crystal Meth,methamphetamine.
ETC Consider our name for acquiring qualitative products in any quantity, safe and time-bound deliveries are what we ensure.
We have developed a large storage facility that is equipped with modern facilities for loading and unloading goods.
Also, it assist us in meeting bulk requirements at a time.
Email Us Via : vvresearchchemicals gmail.
He ended up in a high-security federal prison, and now he's dead.
From the The Bureau of Land Management sees no Fourth Amendment concerns with searching American citizens for reasons to arrest them without probable cause when it comes to their event permits.

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Get Free Money From Acorns Found Money & Boost Your Savings. Did someone say free money? Yeah. that was our own Stephen Pepper calling. He’s found a number of Acorns “found money” options that don’t require a purchase. Sure, each offer will take a couple of minutes of your time to complete, but they won’t cost you a dime — rather.


Enjoy!
$$ Money $$ - Free Minds Book Club & Writing Workshop
Valid for casinos
Freed Finances - Free Your Money Free Your Mind!
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
free minds and free money

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Hello Folks. I am Your Professional Financial Advisor.We at moneymindz.com will Help You to achive your financial goals. So Explore the best Free Financial Advisory Service. We only provide FREE Financial Advice so that you are not miss-guided while buying any kind of financial our best Free Advisory Service. We don't sell any financial products.


Enjoy!
Real Money is Real Title | free-slots-money.website
Valid for casinos
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity? – free-slots-money.website
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Train Your Brain To Make More Money - John Assaraf

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

work and unchaining money from our preconceptions of money. By freeing work and money from the shackles of our assumptions, we’re free to design a more productive, sustainable and fair society with a much broader distribution of real wealth and capital. So why is it important to free money, work, wealth and capital from our


Enjoy!
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity? – free-slots-money.website
Valid for casinos
Real Money is Real Title | free-slots-money.website
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
But is it really a thing?
I mean, are there seriously companies out there that will just give money away because they are nice?
More on that in a minute… We all need our savings accounts to be much larger than they are.
But with bills, credit card debt, and our careers, it sometimes feels almost impossible to increase our savings.
And thanks to the internet, all it usually requires is filling out some free minds and free money surveys, playing around on the web, or signing up for a few specific offers.
Doing just a few of these things can easily add up to thousands of dollars in cash each year, so what are you waiting for?
Are you a while in school?
Check out these 16+ companies that offer free moneywhen you complete simple tasks in your spare time: 1.
Give your opinions for money.
Online survey sites have become a top way for people to cash in doing something pretty mindless in free minds and free money spare time.
While there are a ton out there to choose from has one of the longest histories and free minds and free money a consistent record https://free-slots-money.website/and-money/bones-thugs-and-harmony-for-the-love-of-money.html paying their users.
Some, Pinecone Research, for example, will ship you products to try and then answer questions on them.
Payouts vary, but the points you click here can add up fast.
Read more in our list of the.
Earn points redeemable for gift cards.
Paypal cash, on the other hand, starts at just 3,970 points.
To get started with MyPoints, all you have to do is and use the site to shop online, take surveys, watch videos, or participate in fun, daily polls.
Just by clicking through the website when you shop online, you can earn up to 40 percent cash back at certain stores.
Sounds pretty good, huh?
In all seriousness, the tasks Inbox Dollars pays for are crazy-easy.
Simply surf the internet, use the website to play games, complete surveys or questionnaires, or print grocery coupons to score free cash!
Read more in our.
Rack up some Swagbucks.
Have you ever heard of a part-time job that will pay you just to hang out?
For example, you can cash in your Swagbucks for a wide range of gift cards.
Turn in your points for PayPal cash instead.
Signing up is free and you literally have nothing to lose, either.
You can learn a little more about Swagbucks in 6.
Let Trim save you money automatically.
Trim markets itself as an assistant that saves you money.
Trim is an app that tracks your spending and automates the day-to-day process of saving money for you, helping you cut out recurring charges for services you no longer need.
Trim takes it a step further, helping you tackle debt and strategically cut down on your spending.
Make bank playing trivia.
Do you dominate game nights with friends when it comes to trivia?
If so, you could be banking on your expertise with trivia apps.
Why not put your wealth of knowledge to use and earn some free money fast from the comfort of your couch?
SwagIQ is a live trivia game show where you can make some serious dough.
You just download the app, tune it for the weekly game, and answers the questions in 10 seconds or less.
Answer all the questions correctly, and you get paid.
Sign up for a rewards credit card.
This free cash usually comes in the form of a signup bonus, and can easily be worth hundreds.
Score a bank bonus.
All kinds of banks offer a bonus if you are https://free-slots-money.website/and-money/casino-scratch-and-win-real-money-no-deposit.html to put a certain amount of cash on deposit or sign up for direct deposit.
From Chase to Huntington Bank and others, these bonuses can add up to some serious cash if you can meet their requirements!
My post on the highlights some of the best deals in this space, but you can also check with local banks to see what they offer.
Another way to score bonuses from the bank is to simply have an interest-earning savings account.
So after you get that checking account bonus, find atoo.
Select your state to get started United States 10.
Seated is incredibly easy to use.
The only drawback when it comes to Seated is location.
Seated is currently only available in major cities, free minds and free money Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, NYC, Philadelphia, and San Francisco.
If you live in one of those cities, you can get free money as fast you can download the app and get to your read article restaurant.
Get rebates at local retailers.
Mobile coupon apps like and Checkout 51 allow you to cash in rebates for items you buy on a regular basis.
The apps allow https://free-slots-money.website/and-money/money-and-beer.html to select coupons for things you are already buying and then upload your receipt for those coupons.
You get the money back and all it took was a quick picture of your receipt.
If you are a Walmart shopper, then use the Savings Catcher on the.
When you are done with your purchase, scan your receipt and the app will go out over the next several days and search competitor pricing for your products.
If they find that someone offered that item for less, you will get a rebate for the difference in the form of a Walmart gift card redeemable directly from the app.
Invest money with Stockpile.
You can of companies like Apple and Netflix.
Get refunds with Paribus.
Have you ever bought something only to find out free minds and free money price dropped a few days later?
With Paribus, you can get that money back with zero effort.
All you do is shop online as usual and let Paribus monitor your confirmation emails from retailers.
Whenever the price drops on what you buy, Paribus helps you get refunded.
You can use Paribus to save with popular retailers, like Target, Amazon, Walmart, Nordstrom, and more.
Paribus also applies its services to hotel bookings through Expedia, Priceline, Booking.
Get Paid for Selfies This is a funny free minds and free money />Basically, a company called will pay you to take pictures of yourself in various locations.
They use the information to help companies do marketing in different parts of the country based off of demographic data age, gender, race, etc.
There are always a good number of selfie tasks waiting and people are making a little side money just for taking a few pictures.
Trade your junk mail and get free money.
A company called will actually pay you to mail in your junk mail and forward them your spam email.
This might sound bonkers, but it free minds and free money />Let Billshark Negotiate Your Bills Billshark is a platform that works magic on your bills.
If you hate negotiating rates but want lower bills, this app is your go to.
You just upload your bills to the app or website or email them in and let their Sharks go to work.
Billshark will send you updates as they work to negotiate your bills and save you money.
Billshark regularly reduces phone, internet, cable, satellite, and home security system bills.
You can get started by entering your provider and monthly cost for a 15-second quote on what you could be saving with Billshark.
The Bottom Line The internet offers a treasure trove of ways to get free money in a pinch.
And most of the time, all you have to do to get started is please click for source up and complete mindless tasks like watching videos or answering survey questions.
How do I get money to take care of stuff.
I need legitimate ways of getting cash now.
I LOVE CARRYING OUT THE SURVEYS, BUT MOST OF THE SURVEYS ARE NOT PAID FOR THOSE WHO ARE IN MY COUNTRY CAMEROON.
I want to know how to get a online job or how to get free wifi and free Xfinity wifi and free gift cards aswell Talking about all this, I can only laugh because i remember when I too was looking for ways on how to improve my credit score, I spent hours online, contacting people and watching vidoes, signing up here and there all to no avail until I stumbled upon Cyberdecoders00.
Hi Promise — Just check with some of the sites on this list, and add the money to your bank as you get it.
Hi Tydina — Try a personal loan at a bank or credit union, or at a peer-to-peer lender, like Lending Club or Prosper.
Congrats on the redesign!
Leave a comment Your email address will not be published.
However, the rankings and listings of our reviews, tools and all other content are based on objective analysis.
For more information, please check out our.
The information in our reviews could be different from what you find when visiting a financial institution, service provider or a specific product's website.
All products are presented without warranty.
All written content on this site is for information purposes only.
Opinions expressed herein are solely those of AWM, unless otherwise specifically cited.
All information or ideas provided should be discussed in detail with an advisor, accountant or legal counsel prior to implementation.

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Looks like Minds makes money in 3 ways so far. They also have a referral program that pays out 25% of all revenue generated from people you refer. In-House Advertising Recently Minds released the ability to easily buy points to boost posts.


Enjoy!
MoneyMindz - India's First Free On-Call Financial Advisory
Valid for casinos
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity? – free-slots-money.website
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Rihanna - Pour It Up (Explicit)

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

As for those who rejected, neither their money nor their children will avail them anything from God. They are the fuel of the Fire.. [email protected]


Enjoy!
Financial Advice - Money Minds
Valid for casinos
MoneyMindz - India's First Free On-Call Financial Advisory
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
But is it really a thing?
I mean, are there seriously companies out there that will just give money away because they are nice?
More on that in a minute… We all need our savings accounts to be much larger than they are.
But with bills, credit card debt, and our careers, it sometimes feels almost impossible to increase our savings.
And thanks to the internet, all it usually requires is filling out some paid surveys, free minds and free money around on the web, or signing up for a few specific offers.
Doing free minds and free money a few of these things can easily add up to thousands of dollars in cash each year, so what are you waiting for?
Are you a while in school?
Check out these 16+ companies that offer free moneywhen you complete simple tasks in your spare time: 1.
Give your opinions for money.
Online survey sites have become a top way for people to cash in doing something pretty mindless in their spare time.
While there are a ton out there to choose from has one of the longest histories and has a consistent record of paying their users.
Some, Pinecone Research, for example, will ship you products to try and then answer questions on them.
Payouts vary, but the points you earn can add up fast.
Read more in our list of the.
Earn points redeemable for gift cards.
Paypal cash, on the other hand, starts at just 3,970 points.
To get started with MyPoints, all you have to do is and use the site to shop online, take surveys, watch videos, or participate in fun, daily polls.
Just by clicking through the website when you shop online, you can earn up to 40 percent cash back at certain stores.
Sounds pretty good, huh?
In all seriousness, the tasks Inbox Dollars pays for are crazy-easy.
Simply surf the internet, use the website to play games, complete surveys or questionnaires, or print grocery coupons to score free cash!
Read more in our.
Rack up some Swagbucks.
Have you ever heard of a part-time job that will pay you just to hang out?
For example, you can cash in your Swagbucks for a wide range of gift cards.
Turn in your points for PayPal cash instead.
Signing up is free and you literally have nothing to lose, either.
You can learn a little more about Swagbucks in 6.
Let Trim save you money automatically.
Trim markets itself as an assistant that saves you money.
Trim is an app that tracks your spending and automates the day-to-day process of saving money for you, helping you cut out recurring charges for services you no longer need.
Trim takes it a step further, helping you tackle debt and strategically cut down on your spending.
Make bank free minds and free money trivia.
Do you dominate game nights with friends when it comes to trivia?
If so, you could be banking on your expertise with trivia apps.
Why not put your wealth of knowledge to use and earn some free money fast from the comfort of your couch?
SwagIQ is a live trivia game show where you can make some serious dough.
You just download the app, tune it for the weekly game, and answers the questions in 10 seconds or less.
Answer all the questions correctly, and you get paid.
Sign up for a rewards credit card.
This free cash usually comes in the form of a signup bonus, and can easily be worth hundreds.
Score a bank bonus.
All kinds of banks offer a bonus if you are willing to put a certain amount of cash on deposit or sign up for direct deposit.
From Chase to Huntington Bank and others, these bonuses can add up to some serious cash if you can meet their requirements!
My post on the highlights some of the best deals in this space, but you can also check with local banks to see what they offer.
Another way to score bonuses from the bank is to simply have an interest-earning savings account.
So after you get that checking account bonus, find atoo.
Select your state to get started United States 10.
Seated is incredibly easy to use.
The only drawback when it comes to Seated is location.
Seated is currently only available in major cities, currently Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, NYC, Philadelphia, and San Francisco.
If you live in one of those cities, you can get free money as fast you can download the app and get to your favorite restaurant.
Get rebates at local retailers.
Mobile coupon apps like and Checkout 51 allow you to cash in rebates for items you buy on a regular basis.
The apps allow you to select coupons for things you are already buying and then upload your receipt for those coupons.
You get the money back free minds and free money all it took was a quick picture of your receipt.
If you are a Walmart shopper, then please click for source the Savings Catcher on the.
When you are done with your purchase, scan your receipt and the app will go out over the next several days and search competitor pricing for your products.
If they find that someone offered that item for less, you will get a rebate for the difference in the form of a Walmart gift card redeemable directly from the app.
Invest money with Stockpile.
You can of companies like Apple and Netflix.
Get refunds with Paribus.
Have you ever bought something only to find out the price dropped a few days later?
With Paribus, you can get that money back with zero effort.
All you do is shop online as usual and let Paribus monitor your confirmation emails from retailers.
Whenever the price drops on what you buy, Paribus helps you get refunded.
You can use Paribus to save with popular retailers, like Target, Amazon, Walmart, Nordstrom, and more.
Paribus also applies its services to hotel bookings through Expedia, Priceline, Booking.
Get Paid for Selfies This is a funny one.
Basically, a company called will pay you to take pictures of yourself in various locations.
They use the information to help companies do marketing in different parts of the country based off of demographic data age, gender, race, etc.
There are always a good number of selfie tasks waiting and people are making a little side money just for taking a few pictures.
Trade your junk mail and get free money.
A company called will actually pay you to mail in your junk mail and forward them your spam email.
This might sound bonkers, but it works!
Let Billshark Negotiate Your Bills Billshark is a platform that works magic on your bills.
If you hate negotiating rates but want lower bills, this app is your go to.
You just upload your bills to the app or website or email them in and let their Sharks go to work.
Billshark just click for source send you updates as they work to negotiate your bills and save you money.
Billshark regularly reduces phone, internet, cable, satellite, and home security system bills.
You can get started by free minds and free money your provider and monthly cost for a 15-second quote on what you could be saving with Billshark.
The Bottom Line The internet games and win real money uk a treasure trove of ways to get free money in a pinch.
And most of the time, all you have to do to get started is sign up and complete mindless tasks like watching videos or answering survey questions.
How do I get money to take care of stuff.
I need legitimate ways of getting cash now.
I LOVE CARRYING OUT THE SURVEYS, BUT MOST OF THE SURVEYS ARE NOT PAID FOR THOSE WHO ARE IN MY COUNTRY A and money win game play />I want to know how to get a online job or how to get free wifi and free Xfinity wifi and free gift cards aswell Talking about all this, I can only laugh because i remember when I too was looking for ways on how to improve my credit score, I spent hours online, contacting people and watching vidoes, signing up here and there all to no avail until I stumbled upon Cyberdecoders00.
Hi Promise — Just check with some of the sites on this list, and add the money to your bank as you get it.
Hi Tydina — Try a personal loan at a bank or credit union, or at a peer-to-peer lender, like Lending Club or Prosper.
Congrats on the redesign!
Leave a comment Your email address will not be published.
However, the rankings and listings of our reviews, free minds and free money and all other content are based on objective analysis.
For more information, please check out our.
The information in our reviews could be different from what you find when visiting a financial institution, service provider or a specific product's website.
All products are presented without warranty.
All written content on this site is for information purposes only.
Opinions expressed herein article source solely those of AWM, unless otherwise specifically cited.
All information or ideas provided should be discussed in detail with an advisor, accountant or legal counsel prior to implementation.

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity?. If you want to include turning over the tables of the money changers then I think we have dumbed down violence to a pretty low level.


Enjoy!
$$ Money $$ - Free Minds Book Club & Writing Workshop
Valid for casinos
Freed Finances - Free Your Money Free Your Mind!
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity?
A baker's dozen Christian libertarians weigh in 10.
Over the last year, I've spoken with countless practicing Christians who also fall into what might be called the small- l libertarian camp.
A few prefer "classical liberal" while others identify as full-on anarcho-capitalists.
Many work in the so-called liberty movement, but there were also business owners and writers, musicians and scientists, scholars and priests.
Virtually all see markets, largely or entirely unfettered by the state, as the best mechanism we have for empowering humans to grow and thrive.
I asked them to explain, in their own words, how they manage to reconcile two worldviews that many would have us believe are hopelessly in conflict.
Below is a sampling of what I heard.
Capitalism simply means the freedom of individuals to make contracts and to engage others in a peaceful and voluntary way.
That's precisely what Christ taught.
Reed, president of the Foundation for Economic Education and author of "If someone says to you 'be my friend' and points a gun to you, that is not a good start of a relationship.
God offers us his friendship.
We have a choice to respond or not.
But if it's to make any sense, it has to be free.
You have to be able to say yes and you have to be able to say no.
And here is the really interesting thing: God will respect your decision even when he knows it's not a good idea.
So God, who owns us twice over, and who in a 'my house, my rules' way has the right, if anyone has the right, to tell us what we may and may not do and indeed to force us not to do it—if he's not willing to do that, how can anyone have the right to do it?
I would argue that earthly government is the last thing I should be supporting as a Christian.
And that needs to be the goal.
I think Christians and non-Christians alike can agree: We should help people who are marginalized.
But the question is, OK, how do you do that?
If you look at the church and nonprofit organizations, combined with a really thriving economy, you have the best antidote to long-term poverty that we've ever known.
It really was only in the modern world, with the Enlightenment, when you developed a naturalist group that broke off from the natural law tradition and were advocating liberty based on utilitarian arguments.
And that idea is not Catholic.
The first people to act on behalf of the vulnerable should be individuals, acting as neighbors, acting in communities.
How's that for something that's antithetical to the Christian faith?
Robert Sirico, a Catholic priest and president of Acton Institute "The more I read, the more I realized that there's nowhere in here where Christ attempts to use the tools of violence to accomplish his objectives.
In fact, it was so extreme in the opposite direction that even self-defense wasn't used by Christ and the early Christians.
It started to solidify for me that genuine Christianity is absolutely the opposite of all things political.
You can't enforce the ideas and morals of the kingdom of God with the kingdom of men, which is violence.
The question is whether or not we're willing to empower a third party to interfere with people who would prefer to walk away from something they find objectionable.
I'd prefer not to empower that interference—in the lives of religious people or anyone else.
Brown, host of the and a Quaker convert "Christianity has a lot to say about how we treat those who are in need, those who are less fortunate.
Not just in terms of their material standard of living, but in terms of their political prospects, in terms of their social standing, and in terms of their ability to take control of their lives in fundamental and important ways.
I don't think that's what the Bible told us.
The Bible says to click at this page our talents to the maximum capacity, and to be compassionate to our fellow man.
Those individuals are developing themselves, they're developing the company and the schools we manage, and by doing that they're making this huge contribution to the world and to everybody they touch.
Because that's where we have an opportunity to develop ourselves.
This is consistent with libertarianism??.?
Catholicism has two flags: the papal flag, and the black flag of anarchy!
Tucker, director of content at the Foundation for Economic Education and creator of liberty.
What's un-Christian about that?
The Golden Rule states, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
The non-aggression principle states, Don't do to other people what you don't want done to you.
Call it the negative corollary.
We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them.
Comments do not represent the views of Reason.
We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
Senator Bin Laden might really fuck things up for you….
Start working at home with Google!
I work through this link, go?
Although, at this point, neither is Bin Laden.
But his pals will.
Why would you suicide bomb something when you have the power of a senator?
What I do see, are many religious people disparaging libertarians, usually for their lack of understanding of libertarian beliefs, or their false belief that none of them believe in God.
And then occasionally I see someone claiming libertarians disparage Christianity like you Elias.
Frankly I find Christianity very libertarian.
Neither Christians or libertarians believe in initiating force against others.
Because your extremism is surely the correct one.
Our morality is the correct one.
If prohibiting 100% the initiatory use of force is extreme so be it.
Unless someone steps on your lawn, then you can initiate force against them, for some reason.
These things are so confusing.
Almost as if they make no goddamn sense.
Defending your property rights is retaliatory not initiatory.
Yes trespassing is a form of initiatory force.
You believe people should be allowed to initiate force if they work for the government.
And trespass is just a synonym for violation.
Definition: laissez-faire — abstention by governments from interfering in the workings of the free market.
America was founded on the principle of individual liberty and that government is, at best, a necessary evil and must be restrained for the good of the American People.
Which is what we have now.
So they mostly run around writing tickets.
See Tara Smith Well, everything other than that violates the NAP.
You do understand that you are arguing FOR violence right?
The question is whether you are more motivated than other extremists.
How many buildings have you bombed?
So you think that not initiating force against other humans is an extreme position?
You advocate for immorality.
You should at least warn your neighbors… They have a right to know who you are.
Well what have we been arguing about all this time?
And the boys down at the playground are playing hard to get.
Yeah, because thinking that the government should not tell a poker chips and money business what height ladder to use is extreme.
That means you better love taxes and do as your told, moron.
Romans 13 is why Christianity is incompatible with libertarianism.
For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.
Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority?
But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain.
Also, true Christians love the Trump administration.
Read Revelation or James and it is clear that you need both faith and deeds to pass judgment.
The death bed confession is a catholic thing.
How could a Christian be a libertarian without actively rebelling against and dispobeyjng the state?
Well, for example, if he lives in a libertarian state.
Non-christians trying to explain Christian practice.
Paul was told to renounce Christianity and was killed by the civil government.
Obviously, when Paul enjoins us to be good citizens, there are limits.
Martin Luther King Jr.
MLK Jr accepted the civil consequences of his actions and his subsequent arrest and famous letter from a Birmingham jail.
What can be said from Romans 13 is that Paul approves of a minarchist watch-dog state.
Notice the conditional nature of the end of this pericope a set of verses that forms one coherent unit or thought, suitable for public reading from a text, now usually of scripture.
Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.
Have they given you value, that is goods and services, and mutual respect and honor?
BTW one more reason to get into crypto-coins.
If there are limits, what are those limits and where are they stated?
Because the Bible is the infallible word-of-God.
And your MLK anecdote?
The Old Testament is a collection of writings put together by Jewish rabbis and scribes.
The New Testament is four condensed oral histories of Jesus and a series of letter by the earliest Church fathers trying to navigate between the Jewish authorities and the Roman authorities to make sure the memory of Jesus survived the century.
I will not, for example, try to reconcile why Paul saw fit to let Gentiles eat pork, but not for male Gentiles to lay with other male Gentiles, but will accept that a mortal did his best to hold the newborn church together and his own judgments may have affected how he did so.
That said, we are given the free will to accept or reject Christ and to do good or bad deeds while accepting the consequences.
This is as libertarian as you get: You makes your choices and you takes your chances.
It is disturbing the degree to which all this got perverted when Constantine and the Catholic Church tried to harness each other to their respective causes.
I agree with your analysis of that passage.
And I agree that Continue reading conflicts with libertarianism.
He says lots of things that are not consistent with what Jesus actually said.
Recall that Paul was a persecuter by nature and not one of the original 12.
What is strange is that this was written in an era when the Roman Empire and Christianity were at odds.
It is more of an endorsement that matters of politics and matters of faith are separate categories.
Obedience to God is not necessarily obedience to secular authority.
Taxation is a worldly concern, and is a thing of this world.
The passage makes them explicitly separate things.
Even a squish theological liberal like Jefferson believed in a creator God who is the source of our rights.
Does Jefferson have free minds and free money leave behind his belief in inalienable rights with which we are endowed by our Creator?
To be fair, science has accomplished much since Jefferson was alive.
Darwin published in 1859.
Big Bang was theorized in the 20th century.
Jefferson died in 1826.
He was simply more concerned with THIS world and how to improve life here.
My point was that the majority view in the late 18th century was that there must be a god of some sort because there were no credible scientific theories to explain the origin of Man or the universe.
To say that men are endowed by source creator in the 18th century is really saying these are natural rights.
The creator of some sort being nothing more than the most accepted theory of the origin of man at that time.
Well something has to exist outside the confines of time and space to create the universe.
Well something has to exist outside the confines of time and space to create the universe Citation needed.
If the universe spontaneously created itself from nothing then it becomes by definition god itself, existing without beginning and operating outside of itself.
It should be very easy for you.
Jefferson would have been plenty well acquainted enough with the concepts in his time to have chosen a different phraseology had he so desired.
The Samaritan then starts waylaying people himself, taking their shekels to clothe, feed and get medical help to the mugged guy.
Luke 16-24New Living Translation NLT Parable of the Shrewd Manager ….
The point is that even a selfish person can realize that forgiveness makes the world a better place for himself as well as those forgiven.
The forgiveness was widespread because the manager did not know who he would need to turn to.
There is no taxation, or redistribution in the parable.
No totalitarian state or community ownership of the means of production.
A better text for communism might be the early church in Jerusalem in the first years after Pentecost.
Acts Ch 1-5 approximately.
Even there private property was respected.
No one was compelled to give to the common purse.
I think Jesus makes several comments about voluntarily giving money as opposed to having it taken from you.
I like your post Darth.
The good Samaritan helped keep a guy from dying.
But how much do you think that poor guy felt the help was worth?
Seems to me good Catholics can handle being as generous as the good Samaritan to those whom they believe need help, without asking the government to harm others to do it for them.
The Bible is the story of failed organizations.
Whether it is Jewish kingdoms https://free-slots-money.website/and-money/play-game-and-win-money.html synagogues, the story is the same.
Human organizations inevitably fall prey to corruption.
Why would a Christian want to empower them?
One can argue that means that things like civil liberties are religiously irrelevant too — the cop who martyrs you is just speeding you to paradise, while he and his masters will have their own scores to settle with the almighty.
But others focus more on the need to do good where possible without assuming they need to create a theocracy for Christ to come back.
Some folks get some serious stuff backwards.
Why would a Christian want to empower them?
It is the doctrine of total depravity.
As Paul puts it: — 15 I do not understand what I do.
For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do.
It was the Christian idea of the depravity of man that led the founding fathers to split powers of government and impose checks and balances.
Total depravity of Man is a totally depraved doctrine of a minority of Christians.
Most of the Founding Fathers believed that human beings were endowed with RIGHTS, and that the purpose of government was to secure theses rights, not to make sure these depraved humans stayed in line.
Religious faith and religious institutions are essential to a workable stateless society.
Atheism presents problems, however.
I think they follow a dual supply form of ecclesiology church doctrine.
You can have your chicken and eat it too.
Perhaps why chicken for Sunday dinner is called the sacred bird?
Translation: mystical bigots call freethinkers a-theists believers in nothing whatsoever.
Believers in torture and murder for superstition they define as normal, regular Volk, as in 1930s Germany.
They worshipped the state.
Hitler was an Atheist, anti-smoking, vegetarian dog-lover who supported war and mass murder, a typical Atheist.
Hitler was a believer when it suited him, and an un-believer when it suited him… Like maybe EVERY politician who has ever lived?
For example Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German pastor, theologian, spy, anti-Nazi dissident, and key founding member of the Confessing Church.
Later he was transferred to a Nazi concentration camp.
After being accused of being associated with the plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler, he was quickly tried, along with other accused plotters, including former members of the Abwehr the German Military Intelligence Officeand then executed by hanging on 9 April 1945 as the Nazi regime was collapsing.
Brave man and amazing thinker.
He challenges Christians to abandon complancency to their own mediocrity and to injustice around them.
Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession…Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German pastor, theologian, spy, anti-Nazi dissident, and key founding member of the Confessing Church.
In contrast, the Catholic church chose to collaborate with the regime in return for financial and political benefits despite having the same understanding of the moral evil that Nazism represented as Bonhoeffer.
That is what makes the actions of the Catholic church so morally reprehensible and why the Catholic church bears part of the blame for the crimes and deaths of the Nazi regime.
Including the wholesale slaughter of Catholic clergy at the death camps?
Ooops, you were being a historically illiterate fuckstain again.
Hitler was an Atheist, anti-smoking, vegetarian dog-lover who supported war and mass murder, a typical Atheist.
In addition, the Catholic church also supported war and mass murder throughout its history.
The Catholic church in Germany was simply one of many organizations that failed to do the morally right thing.
However, in the case of the Catholic church, this is particularly damning, since it means that as a moral authority, they are no better than the German dog breeders where Hitler got his dogs.
The country whose intelligentsia explicated nihilism as a philosophy 50 years earlier, culminating in the ascendancy of a genocidal maniac under their banner and the persecution and genocide of Christians and Jews.
Nope, click to see more Germany was not secular in the 1930s.
If the supreme God had wanted us to be socialists, true believers would have no choice but to be socialists.
But I doubt very much that God wants us to be socialists.
If He wanted us to be socialists, why did he give us brains?
Not to mention commandments about the dignity of the individual person, prohibitions on theft, etc.
It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
Nothing in the sentence you reference is incompatible with full-blown atheism.
Both were already in circulation at the time, not necessarily by atheists per se, but by those who explicitly excluded religious arguments from their case.
But I doubt it.
Since there is zero evidence for any being of that sort, I guess we have to trash the whole thing, right?
Further, who said the DoI is the source of libertarian thought?
By all means scrap the Declaration and come up with an alternate rationale.
It would be too bad, though — the American founders gave us such an excellent rationale for liberty — but if the fight against fundamentalism requires that we ditch that rationale and find a new one, so be it, I guess… What a ridiculous strawman.
The only one claiming that atheists have to reject the DoI is you.
In a way that Jefferson himself would have been rather peeved by, given his other beliefs and commitments.
Christians would have an easier time under a libertarian government than a libertarian would have under a Christian government.
Historically, there is no iota of evidence for the existence of a Jesus-Prophet.
For starters, William Dean Howells and Edward Bellamy.
They translated Marxist Red Republicanism into Bryanistic Christian Communism.
If the shoe fits, wear it.
I myself was surprised to learn free minds and free money communism is another altruist religion, but once you replace decapitated, burnt saints bristling with arrows with bureaucrats on the outs and the the more modern methods of torture, it fits.
Observe that both value something that lies on the other side of death.
But surprise is a natural consequence of blind, ignorant superstition even today.
There is far more evidence for Jesus than Julius Caesar, Socrates, Shakespeare, and on and on.
And then we go all Godwin: The Christian National Socialist Germany???
Read the Bible and you will find nothing about exterminating other races.
Who cares how Ayn Rand interpreted an old movie?
There is not one bit of evidence for a junior.
The biblical texts are themselves wonderful evidence that non-Christians have thoroughly studied using standard historical techniques.
But there are significant non-Christian sources as well.
AD 116book 15, chapter 44.
You find a couple of naive Christians who advocate socialism as the most Christian form of governing.
You then jump to the conclusion that Ceau?
The Catholic Church is anti-abortion.
It never occurred to you that Ceau?
This is beyond retarded.
Ceausescu was a lifelong atheist he sang the international Socialist song at his execution, instead of praying and he demolished a lot of churches — including many historical ones.
His regime persecuted Christians and fucked with them in the most petty ways — making people go to work on major holidays Easter, etc.
The Bible was written by human beings, human beings make mistakes.
Or your soul will burn in hell!
Basically removing the hocus pocus in the scripture of the day.
See: The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth.
Jefferson also believed that our rights are God-given.
Maybe his Christianity was too watered-down to count as Christianity, but his theism was clear.
It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?
Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever: that considering numbers, nature and natural means only, a revolution of the wheel of fortune, an exchange of situation, is among possible events: that it may become probable by supernatural interference!
The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in such a contest.
Simple — by the standards of his own day Jefferson was a theological liberal, a skeptic, etc.
Secularism, or humanism, you could ask that question of, but neither is the same thing as atheism.
Atheism denotes nothing more than lack of belief in the existence of deities.
You might as well ask if libertarianism is compatible with hats, or oranges.
Jefferson was a deist heavily influenced by Christianity.
Was Jefferson an atheist?
Did Jefferson condemn atheism as being incompatible with his notion of individual rights?
Paine was widely accused of atheism and was much closer to it than other contemporary deists.
Whether or not he actually was by modern definitions is beside the point, the allegation was debated and discussed in those terms.
But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them.
The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit.
We are answerable for them to our God.
The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others.
But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god.
It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
If it be said, his testimony in a court of justice cannot be relied on, reject it then, and be the stigma on him.
Constraint may make him worse by making him a hypocrite, but it will never make him a truer man.
It may fix him obstinately in his errors, but will not cure them.
Reason and free enquiry are the only effectual agents against error.
Give a loose to them, they will support the true religion, by bringing every false one to their tribunal, to the test of their investigation.
They are the natural enemies of error, and of error only.
All of this evades the simple question: what is a right?
Did ANYONE here take ethics in college?
Read a Tara Smith book?
Atheists can, and many do, accept the notion of inherent rights that attach by consequence of human nature.
Rights are a utilitarian construct designed by man in response to empirical observation of the consistently negative outcomes of aggression and the managerial failings of the State.
If in fact there are a hundred or so papists with weakened reality control able to vote libertarian, the LP should welcome their support for our platform and candidates.
Stephanie is a perfect candidate Fifth Columnist to turn the LP into another Tea Party, exactly the way the Greens and CPUSA wish it would turn.
John Hospers and Tonie Nathan turned the LP platform into Roe v.
But Canada has since become a Sanctuary State for women formerly abused by coercive mystical altruism.
For women who vote with their feet, Canada is the 1 choice for evading conscription into Islamic or National Socialist milch cow womanhood.
Look at the immigration demographics.
Yeah Hank, we get it.
You hate religion, and religious people.
You also like to construct these bizarre, obscure, overly com0,ex false arguments as to why people of faith article source icky.
Which really, makes you the bigot at the end of the day.
The Lateran Treaties are what you are looking for.
WordPress is a blog platform, not an index you fucking halfwit.
And if we wanted to read your delusional rantings on your personal blog we could follow the link in your profile.
And that 98% figure is a fabrication from whole cloth.
If Christians have to own Hitler based on your lies, you can own Stalin based on the truth.
And he will appoint for himself commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots.
He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers.
He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his servants.
He will take the tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his click here and to his servants.
He will take your male servants and female servants and the best of your young men and your donkeys, and put them to his work.
He will take the tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves.
And in that day you will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.
And he will appoint for himself commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots.
He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers.
He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his servants.
He will take the tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his officers agree, msn money and stock quotes words to his servants.
He will take your male servants and female servants and the best of your young men and your donkeys, and put them to his work.
He will take the tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves.
And in that day you will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.
This is in fact true.
The Non-Aggression Principle Republican fascisti struggle to free minds and free money was formulated in 1947, alongside Chapter 10 of Atlas Shrugged.
It only looked, goosestepped and quacked like it.
But objectivist scholars do not insist on laws to punish people who commit suicide.
That was the jurisdictional province of East Germany once International Socialism had replaced National Socialism over there.
Objectivists are about a life worth living.
Freedom from establishment and free exercise are Protestant concepts.
We inherited them from the Peace of Westphalia.
Once it became clear that the religion of the emperor no longer determined the religion of the princes and that people were free to choose their own religion regardless of the religion of the princes, too, murdering each other over the question of who the prince and the emperor should be based on their religion became an unnecessary.
That worked out so well, Madison incorporated it into the First Amendment as such.
In fact, Madison credited Martin Luther with showing us the way on religious freedom.
Thank Calvinism for American capitalism—sure, why not?
Good ideas are good regardless of their source.
It illustrates the excellence of a system which, by a due distinction, to which the genius and courage of Luther led the way, between what is due to Caesar and what is due God, best promotes the discharge of both obligations.
The experience of the United States is a happy disproof of the error so long rooted in the unenlightened minds of well-meaning Christians, as well as in the corrupt hearts of persecuting usurpers, that without a legal incorporation of religious and civil polity, neither could be supported.
A mutual independence is found most friendly to practical Religion, to social harmony, and to political prosperity.
Religious freedom for the unfavored religion could be exercised by moving to the country of a more sympathetic ruler.
As far as I can make out from the flow of words, the Lutherans were establishing a congregation with English-language services, which seems to have been a matter of some controversy with the German-speakers.
First Amendment freedom of religion is a point of Protestant doctrine.
Of these that of the priests is the more weighty, since they have to render an account for even the kings of men in the divine judgment.
You are also aware, dear son, that while you are permitted honorably to rule over human kind, yet in things divine you bow your head humbly before the leaders of the clergy and await from their hands the means of your salvation….
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
GAWD does love me, yes free minds and free money, Keeps me safe, and gives me feed, Shelters me from bad drugs and weed, And gives me all that I might need!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
DEA, CIA, KGB, Our protectors, they will be, FBI, TSA, and FDA, With us, astride us, in every way!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
Yes, Guv-Mint loves me!
My Nannies tell me so!
When the Muslim armies first overran what is now Iran, the people there were predominantly Zoroastrian.
Over the ensuing decades, many of them wanted to convert to Islam, but their Muslim conquerors needed them to pay the tax on non-Muslims.
So, they did a few free minds and free money />I maintain that our rights are natural for a number of reasons.
For one, they arise naturally as an aspect of our agency and, for another, violating them tends to have the same kinds of negative consequences in the natural world across all cultures and throughout history.
Communism ended up on the ash heap of history for similar reasons.
I appreciate that there were antecedents before Luther.
The Golden Rule permeates our culture even LGBT atheists will argue that they should be treated the way others would want to be treated if others were them because it came to us by way of Christianity—not because it came to us by way of Zoroastrianism, the Vedic tradition, or somewhere else.
Luther lived in a time and place, and he was influenced by things he was exposed to in the real world.
That being said, the separation of church and state was a Protestant concept and it came to American culture and institutions by way of the Reformation and radical Protestants.
Thank the Reformation and radical Protestants.
I would agree that America was a Protestant country at the time of the founding not 100%, but culturally Protestant and would not have accepted an idea which they considered to be of purely non-Protestant origin.
I meant to say that freedom of religion as we have it in the First Amendment came from Protestant ideas.
In fact, James Madison, the author of the First Amendment, credited Martin Luther with showing us the way.
And why should that attribution be resisted?
Good ideas come from wherever you find them.
Westphalian principles let the princes determine their own religion in their own principalities—without interference from the emperor—and it let individuals within each principality choose their own faith—be it Catholic, Lutheran, or Calvinism.
I might add that when the history of ISIS is written, their failures may correctly be blamed on the failure to adhere to this principle.
In fairness we should probably admit that freedom of religion means freedom of Christianity.
The counterpoint was Ben Franklin used an example of a Mufti preaching in a public space but I think that was hypothetical.
And yet the first British colony in America to have any kind of religious tolerance was the Catholic colony of Maryland.
If you were a believer in the Trinity, you could freely practice your faith there, meaning it excluded Jews and Muslims.
Martin Luther simply broke up the monopoly the Roman Catholic Church had on western Europe.
Roger Williams founded Rhode Island as a refuge for religious dissenters against the Puritans only four years after Maryland received its charter.
Both were founded before the Peace of Westphalia.
Religious wars and their causes were a hot topic at the time.
Even the believer Erhman Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew admits that.
Eric July is a Hoppean nutter.
His Christianity might not be incompatible with libertarianism, but his actual political views sure are.
Some of these people have very strange, non-biblical ideas of Christianity.
God offers us his friendship.
We have a choice to respond or not.
I wish there were a way I could stop that.
He absolutely used violence to do that.
What was Sodom and Gomorrah?
What was the flood?
What were the various genocides God commanded the Israelites to carry out?
If you want to include turning over the tables of the money changers then I think we have dumbed down violence to a pretty low level.
The Bible illustrates some pretty harsh collective punishments meted out by God.
In fact, Jesus even explains that though God will channel your wickedness to His own ends, you will still be held personally accountable.
He was speaking specifically to the example of Judas.
Without Judas there is no crucifixion, yet this is no excuse for his betrayal.
It ignores cause and effect.
And God specifically told the Israelites it was okay for them to commit genocide.
Funny, but not one of these actually says that.
You should submit your translation indicating where all others were remiss.
I wish there were a way I could stop that.
God is not holding a gun to your head, but there are consequences, just like anything.
The gun just happens to be floating there, controlled by no one.
Hell is just a thing that happens!
The whole point of the gun to your head analogy is that God is like a mugger with a gun.
This is no different than the threat of Hell.
God gives you the option of disobeying, but with the understanding that He will condemn you to eternal torment if you do.
An eternity in Hell for acts committed in the 80 or less years we have on Earth always seemed a little harsh to me.
It is not a gun.
It is a door, and you choose to walk out of it or not by your actions and to stay out by not repenting actions that separate you from God.
Hell is not a fire pit with goat-like creatures poking you with sticks.
Depends on your version of Christianity.
Some think of hell as you describe.
Christianity is all about free will and choice.
Christianity is about freedom via the correct operation of precise spiritual wisdom by the LIVING example of Jesus Of Nazareth, called I-AM-ness.
Answer me THAT one!
The Cleansing of the Temple?
Do your best to make the world a better place at the local level.
Sounded pretty libertarian to me.
The problem with religion is that it has been one of the largest excuses for more violations of the NAP throughout nearly all of modern history.
Well this book says I should kill you.
You want to put this substance in your body?
Sorry my twisted view of this text says you should go to jail so I can save your soul.
These are about the most un-libertarian positions one can have.
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!!
Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE Romans 3:10.
So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything.
And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses!
All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses.
I am sure I will find it soon!
It has little if anything to do with being a scriptural literalist.
It has to do with loving your neighbor… I thought militant atheism was one of the largest excuses for more violations of the NAP throughout nearly all of modern history.
The Bolsheviks, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and other cheerful types created a whole lot source mayhem than all the Christians combined in modern history.
Their seething hatred was unmatched by the most rigid Christians.
Atheism was incidental to it, as evidenced by how important the Orthodox Church was to Stalin when he found it convenient.
There were and are plenty of Christian Socialists, and Marxists, and Fascists, just as there are atheist versions of all of them.
From Wikipedia, which leads me to believe that the anti-Christian sentiment was hardly incidental: The League of Militant Atheists aided the Soviet government in killing clergy and committed believers.
Between 1927 and 1940, the number of Orthodox churches in the Russian Republic fell from 29,584 to fewer than 500.
During the purges of 1937 and 1938, church documents record that 168,300 Russian Orthodox clergy were arrested.
Of these, over 100,000 were shot.
Despite complaints, even by APL members, all churches, mosques, monasteries, and other religious institutions were either closed down or converted into warehouses, gymnasiums, or workshops by the end of 1967.
In parallel, a Soviet-style purge campaign was launched in the Communist Party and the Mongolian army.
The Mongol leader at that time was Khorloogiin Choibalsan, follower of Joseph Stalin, who emulated many of the policies that Stalin developed in the Soviet Union.
The purges succeeded in virtually eliminating Lamaism and cost an estimated thirty to thirty-five thousand lives You get the idea.
Atheism was one of the main goals of communism perhaps the main goal, according to some thinkers and it was often brutally implemented.
Even rival brands of Marxism were an intolerable threat to the regime: look at the hatred between Leninists and Maoists, and Void help the Trotskyites.
The same No True Scotsman cop out could be use by Christians to dodge the original charge as well.
Which is kind of the point.
But I was never asserting that: only that I had never heard of it being done.
Whereas there have been plenty of genocides perpetrated avowedly for the cause of Christ.
Atheism is a weapon for non-theist religions, but rarely is it a religion by itself.
Voluntary altruism is precious, and should be treasured and honored.
I think she saw it as counter-productive.
As for the tenants of classic Christianity, who were more info />The monks living in hollowed out caves?
The First Commandment clashes with the First Amendment A better article would be more detailed about WHICH Christian denomination is compatible with libertarian ideals, and then to focus on the MOST libertarian of them all, which would surprise many to be the AMISH.
Many Leftists use the Amish as an example of the perfect SOCIALIST society, but in fact the Amish are a perfect example of a more libertarian or Arden, Delaware type community.
As a semi-expert on their faith, I know that the Amish basically leave each other alone except for when there is dire need.
Even the Amish in modern America are more tolerant and moderate than the SJWs and Muslims.
But even if you did, libertarianism is fortunate enough to have the market as just such a mechanism.
It is, indeed, impossible to have a libertarian society whilst forcing people to associate with one another against their will.
Which is a desirable feature to totalitarian stains on humanity like you.
The people of Israel and Judea, celebrating Sabbath, screamed for His crucifixion, as Roman Pilate washed his hands in innocence.
Is Christianity compatible with Libertarianism?
Fortunately, some Christians have learned to justify those parts into irrelevancy or flat-out ignore them.
But any literal interpretation?
Word salad is a hallmark of charlatanry.
The drivel you just posted looks like it was generated by a bot running on 8086 hardware, or a Management undergraduate.
I was an atheist for the first half of my life on pretty much the same grounds as Ayn Rand and George H.
Then I had a series of experiences that satisfied my rational skepticism and convinced me of the existence of God.
These were not religious experiences because they were not based on dogma, scripture, or accepting anything on faith.
When I was an atheist I was a libertarian.
Now that I view God as a real existent I am still a libertarian.
So I am chagrined that Reason magazine feels it necessary to question whether a particular religion, Christianity, is compatible with libertarianism.
The right question is whether one can both affirm the existence of God and accept libertarian principles.
Is Christianity compatible with libertarianism in its current, powerless-to-set-heretics-on-fire form?
Sure, why not… same with other popular works of fiction, like Harry Potter or Spider-man.
Yahweh; one of the lietmotifs of the Old Nonsense is that any time Yahweh changes his mind, large numbers of things die.
At the end of the day, the Jeebus death-porn cult is going the way of all religions.
Seems similar to the Priestly money-changers-money-lenders and todays Fed Banking Cartel the famous Rabbi discovered in the Temple and ended with his execution.
May I just say that, reading the comments on this blog is so refreshing!
As an old Ayn Rand Objectivist, I am upset constantly by the slander and vulgar name-calling of other sites with no resolution.
I thought Reason could not do an objective, calm discourse on religion, but it has!
And it is wonderful.
I have learned so much and feel I have found my home for talking and learning.
He was starting a rebellion among the people in Judea.
This rebellion would bring the Roman Legions and possibly threaten the Priests.
It was the Priests that convinced the Roman Governor to execute the rebel Rabbi.
If the State was the Roman Empire then rather than the State… it seems the corrupt Priests were responsible for the crucifixion.
Somewhat similar to a corporate lobbyist bribing a few members of Congress to pass a law that favors the corporation.
Jesus was an enemy of the state and its taxes.
That is why the chief tax collector for Judea, P.
Christianity is absolutely not compatible with the Libertarian Party and its mouthpieces like this website.
Mentally deranged party acolytes like Hank Phillips and Sevo above being prime examples.
Hard for a religion to be compatible with a political party when the political party requires forcing people to violate the tenets of their religion.
The question I had to ask myself before going further was: Would I want someone like him in office?
No, I would not.
We sure could use some more Harry Browne types in the LP today.
He was a real Libertarian.
He makes the case for the KJV distorting the chapter to endorse statism, when it does nothing of the kind.
The breaking of the seal on His tomb was an act against the State, in and of it self.
Jesus was the first nonviolent voluntaryist and illegal-tax protester.
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity?
Our company has an extensive list on medications and can provide all shipping options like Regular post, EMS, DHL.
Xanax ,Opana ,Percocet ,methadone ,Amphetamine ,Mephedrone ,Nembutal Pentobarbital,Actavis promethazine codeine ,Medical Marijuana ,Crystal Meth,methamphetamine.
ETC Consider our name for acquiring qualitative products in any quantity, safe and time-bound deliveries are what we ensure.
We have developed a large storage facility that is equipped with modern facilities for loading and unloading goods.
Also, it assist us in meeting bulk requirements at a time.
Email Us Via : vvresearchchemicals gmail.
He ended up in a high-security federal prison, and now he's dead.
From the The Bureau of Land Management sees no Fourth Amendment concerns with searching American citizens for reasons to arrest them without probable cause when it comes to their event permits.

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

FreeMoney.com is your online trusted free money and financial resource. FreeMoney analyzes and reviews the many online money-making opportunities out there.


Enjoy!
Are Free Minds and Free Markets Compatible With Christianity? – free-slots-money.website
Valid for casinos
Freed Finances - Free Your Money Free Your Mind!
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
FREE'MINDS - Lock N Key [MUSIC VIDEO]

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

How To Start Making Money Online with Mind Maps. Up Next. You'll get instant access to free resources, including my most popular book, Ebooks the Smart Way.


Enjoy!
free-slots-money.website – Free Minds and Free Markets
Valid for casinos
free-slots-money.website – Free Minds and Free Markets
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
TASH SULTANA - 'MURDER TO THE MIND' (Official Video)

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Free Minds uses books, creative writing, and peer support to awaken incarcerated and formerly incarcerated youths and adults to their own potential. Through creative expression, job readiness training, and violence prevention outreach, these poets achieve their education and career goals, and become powerful voices for change in the community.


Enjoy!
Real Money is Real Title | free-slots-money.website
Valid for casinos
Get Free Money Fast: 16 Sites That Will Get You $2,100 (or MORE)
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
There is much debate over what is REAL MONEY among American patriots and the debate has grown to encompass global aspects as the frauds of the monetary systems world-wide become more evident.
Even the well-meaning can lead you astray.
There are some things you should know before jumping in to "real money" offers or making the assumption that 'legal tender' is real money.
The governments, bankers, lawyers, the Crown, Federal Reserve System, the Rothschilds, the Bank of England and countless others hereafter the LIARS have gone to great lengths to define.
They have taught us through their government-controlled banking and government-controlled education systems that money is anything that people have trust in and is used for the exchange of goods and services.
History, however, does not define money in such simplistic, self-serving terms, as the LIARS want us to believe.
Money in its basest definition is value exchanged for equal or agreed-to value.
You work your butt off all week and you receive money in exchange for your labor.
Your labor was valuable to your employer and to your family.
You own title to your labor and you exchange your labor for title to something of equal or agreed-to value.
Prior to the 1900's - when a person received his pay - he received value for value.
You performed a hundred dollars worth of labor and received a hundred dollars of what?
For the convenience gold and silver was primarily used, but not always.
You could exchange your labor for food, for rent, for countless goods and services directly for your labor.
In a sense, those goods and services were money.
Gold, silver, bronze and other metal coins have been used 'as money' and 'for money' for thousands of years.
It was the historical demand free minds and free money the worker which forced the governments and the employers to return something of equal value for the labor performed.
Anything less is bordering on slavery.
These metals were and have always been in demand for industry, jewelry, etc.
The commodity exchange value free minds and free money metals and other goods is a benchmark of the value of these items NOT COMMODITY PRICE.
It is evidence of the value of industrial demand versus supply of these goods.
Throughout history these metals have free minds and free money the things MOST in demand and all other goods and services are valued by what is most in demand for industry.
Metals are expensive to find, process, and prepare for use, making their value even greater.
Precious metals have an intrinsic industrial demand and therefore have value.
Your labor is yours and yours alone.
You hold title or ownership of your labors, until you decide to exchange those labors for something else of determined value.
So to exchange the title of your labor for title i.
Gold, silver, platinum, palladium, bronze, and gems have traditionally met this criteria.
These items by themselves are useless to our everyday survival, but there is someone that is willing to pay or exchange to get those metals, giving them value.
When you have exchanged your labor for silver or gold coins, you have agreed to release title to your labor and received title to the coins.
The title of equal value remains yours.
When is 'money' not money?
Paper is what the LIARS and creating making money apps us to believe is money.
We have paper and it is money?
The LIARS have the gold, silver, platinum, palladium, and precious gems.
Regardless of the patriot slurs, paper does have intrinsic value and is not worthless.
So it has some intrinsic value.
Your value is just very low and I have reams of paper to pay you with.
When you accept paper in exchange for your labor you exchanged title to the value of your labor for something that has very little value.
History shows that government and bank paper is not something of great value.
The United States printed paper dollars in the 1700's called the continentals.
People accepted them for payment of their labors, but no one would exchange rent, food, beer, etc.
The people were not fooled into taking worthless paper for their labor.
They simply were not "worth a greenback.
The people preferred and continued to exchange in the money of Spain - gold and silver.
The early Texians like the U.
Americans were not stupid enough to accept something that was free minds and free money worth their labor.
The government and the bankers did not pull the wool or paper over their eyes.
Germany did the same with the mark in the 1930-40's.
The workers finally quit taking the worthless paper.
One reason that war was invoked was to resurrect an industry war industry to re-establish another one of the LIARS' failures.
Then enter the scams and the frauds - I mean bankers - LIARS.
The people were enticed and led to believe that paper backed by gold and silver was money.
So they began to trade their labors for certificates of gold and silver.
The gold and silver was in the banks and free minds and free money certificate proved it!
Yes certificates did certify the gold and silver was in the bank.
The laborer had a certification that title to that amount of gold and silver existed.
However, he did NOT have title to the gold or silver.
He had a click to see more that a title existed, but never did he get title to the gold or silver, nor was the title full ownership of the metal given to him.
The banker had title to the gold and silver you worked for and you had paper or proof that somewhere the gold and silver existed.
Soon the greedy banker LIAR had issued more paper certifying that more gold and silver existed than actually did exist.
He even pawned loaned the gold and silver he had certified existed at his bank and what you thought YOU had on deposit.
That was the banking panic of 1897, 1907 and 1929!
People started demanding the gold and silver for the paper and there simply was not enough gold and silver to cover the paper face amount.
The LIARS were caught in their LIES!
The people had accepted paper for their labor, instead of the ownership and title of the gold and silver.
It cost them dearly.
Federal Government, backed, supported, bankrolled, and became partners with the same people that had injured millions of their own citizens.
In fact, the people did not have ownership of the gold and silver in the banks with the certificates.
During 1929 through 1933, people had 'what they thought was money' on deposit and in savings accounts.
The banker LIARS foreclosed on the people's loans that the bankers had STOLEN from the people to begin with.
Even though the same people had 'money' in savings the LIAR bankers would not credit their loans from their savings.
They would foreclose on a thousand dollar loan when you had ten thousand dollars on deposit in the same bank and the LIARS would not let you have access to your funds.
Federal Government encouraged and enforced just click for source bankers' frauds and rampage against the people.
The moral that the American people SHOULD have learned was NEVER lose title to your labor!
Never accept less than full title, and certificates gold and silver certificates ARE less than full title.
A certificate of a title IS NOT a TITLE!
There is a world of difference between a deposit receipt and a certificate of deposit.
There is a world of legal difference between a sales receipt a fraud and a bill of sale!
Paper representing someone's title to gold and silver is the free minds and free money banking started.
Little scripts of paper, documented the title holder to a certain amount of gold or silver.
Holder bearer in due course of the script of paper had title and full ownership of the metal on deposit.
The banker had NO right or authority to any gold and silver that was stored with him.
He could not loan someone else's gold and silver!
He could not make interest money with YOUR gold and silver.
The gold and silver on deposit with him, represented by title script was NOT an asset, but a liability to the banker and on his bookkeeping, because it is money he owes the depositor or script holder.
The bank's income came from renting a person space in his vaults a service fee.
During the depression, communities returned to the script method of banking in the South, and they were actually called 'scrip.
The worker could actually spend his scrip at local stores, by signing over his right to the silver the reptilian LIARS' kept the people from the goldfree minds and free money transferring title in the metal to the store owner.
Modern banking by the LIARS has everything turned around backwards.
This scam has been going on for over 70 years.
Your local friendly hometown banker is in actuality an agent and arm of the U.
Federal government, representing the interests of the Federal Reserve.
He is there to collect the notes!
A note is a simple contract evidencing a debt.
This was accomplished through a maze of corporate laws and a maze of banking laws and another maze of illegal codes and regulations.
Why are there no more private banks?
All banks are government controlled entities.
Every state government is a partner in this fraud.
They all have their hands in YOUR cookie jar.
They have taught and convinced the world- this is banking, when in reality it is THEFT.
Your deposits become their assets.
When you deposit you lose ALL rights and ownership of the funds, regardless of how little the intrinsic value of your deposit was.
They can tell you when and how and sometimes IF you can have access to your own money.
You lost title when you accepted a debt free minds and free money for your labor, then deposited THEIR 'debt note funds' or 'legal tender', of which you never had full title to begin with!
You accepted something worth even less than paper money.
You accepted a debt note.
The debt is not your personal debt, but one the government LIARS owe to the banker LIARS.
The NOTE you carried and deposited was NEVER yours.
It is the LIARS' debt notes.
Look at an American Note dollar.
NO where does it say money on it.
It doesn't use the lawful two strike dollar symbol on it.
The government LIARS won't make that mistake.
The courts would rule against them.
It is a ONE Federal Reserve Note - not one dollar!
The words ONE DOLLAR is the amount the U.
This is 'legal tender' for all debts public and private.
IT is not money.
It was not intended to be money.
The debt referred to is the government's public and private not told to the public debt to the Bank of England and the Rothschilds, via their bastardized Federal Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service, the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International Settlements, and this list includes 99% of all banks, central banks, and taxing entities in the world.
There are two seals of two entities on the front of the ONE NOTE dollar?
One is the seal of the Treasury of the United States.
The other is the seal of the Federal Reserve.
Seals are used as signature for parties and entities representing more than one "live person" and are used in international commerce as signature seals.
To make a contract valid and the note enforceable in law, there must be signatures of two parties entering the contract.
Under the seal of the Federal Reserve, you can see the 'TREASURER' of the United States signed the note for the United States Visit web page />This is the treasurer's acknowledgement that the seal is accepted as legitimate.
Underneath the Treasury seal, the Secretary of the Treasury has signed, thus giving his acceptance of that being the legal seal of the Treasury.
Note: the Treasurer has accepted the Federal Reserve seal as legitimate and the Secretary of the Treasury accepted the Treasury seal.
Who does the Secretary of the Treasury work for?
THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!
The Secretary of the Treasury is NOT a lawful or constitutional position.
The constitution and laws placing the constitution into effect only provided for the Treasurer.
The Secretary of the Treasury is NOT a government, at least not a lawful occupation or position.
Does this picture become clearer?
You are exchanging your hard work for someone else's debt!
Not to worry though, you can exchange the debt at the company store and if you are fast enough the value won't change too drastically before you get there.
This is why your deposit at the bank becomes the LIARS' asset!
You reduced HIS debt!
check this out simple balance sheet bookkeeping.
Tired of this SCAM and FRAUD?
Every congressman, senator, president, judge, governor, attorney general, IRS agent, etc.
The Rothschilds own most of the platinum on the face of the earth.
They stole it by stealing your labors.
When you buy a car there is a catalytic converter on it.
It has a small amount of platinum inside the converter.
When the catalytic converter wears out, like a muffler, you have to replace it.
It costs about a hundred ONE FRN's Federal Reserve Notes - dollars?
You can get your old muffler back.
Try getting your old catalytic converter!.
They won't let you have it.
The platinum is reclaimed and sent to ROTHSCHILD owned warehouses.
You https://free-slots-money.website/and-money/play-online-games-and-win-money-for-free.html paying for the same platinum over and over and over.
YOU never had title to the converter.
You never had title to the car!
You had a certificate of title.
If we can ever right the money wrongs being perpetrated by the reptilian LIARS, we have to stop accepting their debt notes for our labor - BEFORE their fraudulent system fails.
It's a natural end result of LIES.
The current system is overdue for failure and it has taken hook and crook to keep it sustained for this long.
We have to demand value for our just click for source and preserve the title to the value of our labor.
Right now we are simply selling ourselves, not just short, but for negative credits.
Real money must preserve and guarantee the true title and and make real money of the labor.
If not, you are at their mercy.
Commodities are materials placed on the market for industry and it is one thousand percent controlled by the LIARS.
If you purchase gold and silver with debt notes of the Federal Reserve then THEY OWN the gold and silver you thought you purchased.
You cannot buy gold and silver 'as money.
If gold and silver is money then it must be exchanged at an exchange rate.
However, if you exchanged the trading unit of a government USD?
Nations are sovereign to themselves and they do NOT buy other money.
They exchange money on a value-based exchange rate.
If we as humans are sovereign then we must do the same when dealing with another sovereign entity.
We are NOT in the market to purchase metal for industrial use.
We MIGHT be in the market to sell to industrial needs.
Many can remember Granny saying, "I used to buy six loaves of bread for a dollar.
In 1950 the dollars were still based on silver.
In reality, the vehicle cost much less than in the 1950's, because look at how much MORE car and technical improvements you get with the SAME amount of silver.
The price and value have NOT risen.
Only the number of fraudulent debt notes being used as money.
Things of value remain virtually the same value at all times.
The only things changing are the DEBT NOTES which are controlled by the creators of the debt and the bankers - THE LIARS' CLUB.
It's their insanity game and we have to get out of the game.
This is why it is critical to you and I to preserve title to our labor and title to what we exchange for our labor.
Paper can be 'as money'.
Debt notes can be used 'as money,' but for the humans doing all the labor it is a very dangerous game to be in.
Gold and silver are not the only things of value that can be used for money, but these metals are recognizable and are convenient for most people.
By Lauren Savage Taken from: In October 2018, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia began its prosecution of the prominent Islamic researcher, Sheikh Hassan al-Maliki, in the Specialized Criminal Court in Riyadh, which was specially established in January 2009 to handle cases of terrorism and national securi Every year, a common occurrence is a dispute between followers of various sects about when so-called Ramadan starts and ends.
This year is no exception and some countries ended their so-called Ramadan one day before others.

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

This is how people become really cool, original, and fun to be around. This is how they also train their subconscious to attract money with their minds. Add a couple of frugal life tips, and knowledge on how to spend money wisely, and you can begin creating your own unique style of wealth no matter how much money you make.


Enjoy!
MoneyMindz - India's First Free On-Call Financial Advisory
Valid for casinos
$$ Money $$ - Free Minds Book Club & Writing Workshop
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
There is much debate over what is REAL MONEY among American patriots and the debate has grown to encompass global aspects as the frauds of the monetary systems world-wide become more evident.
Even the well-meaning can lead you astray.
There are some things you should know before jumping in to "real money" offers or making the assumption that 'legal tender' is real money.
The governments, bankers, lawyers, the Crown, Federal Reserve System, the Rothschilds, the Bank of England and countless others hereafter the LIARS have gone to great lengths to define.
They have taught us through their government-controlled banking and government-controlled education systems that money is anything that people have trust in and is used for the exchange of goods and services.
History, however, does not define money in such simplistic, self-serving terms, as the LIARS want us to believe.
Money in its basest definition is value exchanged for equal or agreed-to value.
You work your butt off all week and you receive money in exchange for your labor.
Your labor was valuable to your employer and to your family.
You own title to your labor and you exchange your labor for title to something of equal or agreed-to value.
Prior to the 1900's - when a person received his pay - he received value for value.
You performed a hundred dollars worth of labor and received a hundred dollars of what?
For click the following article convenience gold and silver was primarily used, but not always.
You could exchange your labor for food, for rent, for countless goods and services directly for your labor.
In a sense, those goods and services were money.
Gold, silver, bronze and other metal coins have been used 'as money' and 'for money' for thousands of years.
It was the historical demand of the worker which forced the governments and the employers to return something of equal value for the labor performed.
Anything less is bordering on slavery.
These metals were and have always been in demand for industry, jewelry, etc.
The commodity exchange value of metals and other goods is a benchmark of the value of these items NOT COMMODITY PRICE.
It is evidence of the value of industrial demand versus supply of these goods.
Throughout history these metals have been the things MOST in demand and all other goods and services are valued by what is most in demand for industry.
Metals are expensive to find, process, and prepare for use, making their value even greater.
Precious metals have an intrinsic industrial demand and therefore have value.
Your labor is yours and yours alone.
You hold title or ownership of your labors, until you decide to exchange those labors for something else of determined value.
So to exchange the title of your labor for title i.
Gold, silver, platinum, palladium, bronze, and gems have traditionally met this criteria.
These items by themselves are useless to our everyday survival, but there is someone that is willing to pay or exchange to get those metals, giving them value.
When you have exchanged your labor for silver or gold click the following article, you have agreed to release title to your labor and received title to the coins.
The title of equal value remains yours.
When is 'money' not money?
Paper is what the LIARS want us to believe is money.
We have paper and it is money?
The LIARS have the gold, silver, platinum, palladium, and precious gems.
Regardless of the patriot slurs, paper does have intrinsic value and is not worthless.
So it has some intrinsic value.
win free real scratch money and cards value is just very low and I have reams of paper to pay you with.
When you accept paper in exchange for your labor you exchanged title to the value of your labor for something that has very little value.
History shows that government and bank paper is not something of great value.
The United States printed paper dollars in the 1700's called the continentals.
People accepted them for payment of their labors, but no one would exchange rent, food, beer, etc.
The people were not fooled into taking worthless paper for their labor.
They simply were not "worth free minds and free money greenback.
The people preferred and continued to exchange in the money of Spain - gold and silver.
The early Texians like the U.
Americans were not stupid enough to accept something that was not worth their labor.
The government and the bankers did not pull the wool or paper over their eyes.
Germany did the same with the mark in the 1930-40's.
The workers finally quit taking the worthless paper.
One reason that war was invoked was to resurrect an industry war industry to re-establish another one of the LIARS' failures.
Then enter the scams and the frauds - I mean bankers - LIARS.
The people were enticed and led to believe that paper backed by gold and silver was money.
So they began to trade their labors for certificates of gold and silver.
The gold and silver was in the banks and the certificate proved it!
Yes certificates did certify the gold and silver was in the bank.
The laborer had a certification that free minds and free money to that amount of gold and silver existed.
However, he did NOT have title to the gold or silver.
He had a certificate that a title existed, but never did he get title to the gold or silver, nor was the title full ownership of the metal given to him.
The banker had title to the gold and silver you worked for and you had paper or proof that somewhere the gold and silver existed.
Soon the greedy banker LIAR had issued more paper certifying that more gold and silver existed than actually did exist.
He even pawned loaned the gold and silver he had certified existed at his bank and what you thought YOU had on deposit.
That was the banking panic of 1897, 1907 and 1929!
People started demanding the gold and silver for the paper and there simply was not enough gold and silver to cover the paper face amount.
The LIARS were caught in their LIES!
The people had accepted paper for their labor, instead of the ownership and title of the gold and silver.
It cost them dearly.
Federal Government, backed, supported, bankrolled, and became partners with the same people that had injured millions of their own citizens.
In fact, the people did not have ownership of the gold and silver in the banks with the certificates.
During 1929 through 1933, people had 'what they thought was money' on deposit and in savings accounts.
The banker LIARS foreclosed on the people's loans that the bankers had STOLEN from the people to begin with.
Even though the same people had 'money' in savings the LIAR bankers would not credit their loans from their savings.
They would foreclose on a thousand dollar loan when you free minds and free money ten thousand dollars on deposit in the same bank and the LIARS would not let you have access to your funds.
click at this page Government encouraged and enforced the bankers' frauds and rampage against the people.
The moral that the American people SHOULD have learned was NEVER lose title to your labor!
Never accept less than full title, and certificates gold and silver certificates ARE less than full title.
A certificate of a title IS NOT a TITLE!
There is a world of difference between a deposit receipt and a certificate of deposit.
There is a world of legal difference between a sales receipt a fraud and a bill of sale!
Paper representing someone's title to gold and silver is the way banking started.
Little scripts of paper, documented the title holder to a certain amount of gold or silver.
Holder bearer in due course of the script of paper had title and full ownership of the metal on deposit.
The banker had NO right or authority to any gold and silver that was stored with him.
He could not loan someone else's gold and silver!
He could not make interest money with YOUR gold and silver.
The gold and silver on deposit with him, represented by title script was NOT an asset, but a liability to the banker and on his bookkeeping, because it is money he owes the depositor or script holder.
The bank's income came from renting a person space in his vaults a service fee.
During the depression, communities returned to the script method of banking in the South, and they were actually called 'scrip.
The worker could actually spend his scrip at local stores, by signing over his right to the silver the reptilian LIARS' kept the people from the goldand transferring title in the metal to the store owner.
Modern banking by the LIARS has everything turned around backwards.
This scam has been going on for over 70 years.
Your local friendly hometown banker is in actuality an agent and arm of the U.
Federal government, representing the interests of the Federal Reserve.
He is there to collect the notes!
A note is a simple contract more info a debt.
This was accomplished through a maze of corporate laws and a maze of banking laws and another maze of illegal codes and regulations.
Why are there no more private banks?
All banks are government controlled entities.
Every state government is a partner in this fraud.
They all have their hands in YOUR cookie jar.
They have taught and convinced the world- this is banking, when in reality it is THEFT.
Your deposits become their assets.
When you deposit you lose ALL rights and ownership of the funds, regardless of how little the intrinsic value of your deposit was.
They can tell you when and how and sometimes IF you can have access to your own money.
You lost title when you accepted a debt note for your labor, then deposited THEIR 'debt note funds' or 'legal tender', of which you never had full title to begin with!
You accepted something worth even less than paper money.
You accepted a debt note.
The debt is not your personal debt, but one the government LIARS owe to the banker LIARS.
The NOTE you carried and deposited was NEVER yours.
It is the LIARS' debt notes.
Look at an American Note dollar.
NO where does it say money on it.
It doesn't use the lawful two strike dollar symbol on it.
The government LIARS won't make that mistake.
The courts would rule against them.
It is a ONE Federal Reserve Note - not one dollar!
The words ONE DOLLAR is the amount the U.
This is 'legal tender' for all debts public and private.
IT is not money.
It was not intended to be money.
The debt referred to is the government's public and private not told to the public debt to the Bank of England and the Rothschilds, via their bastardized Federal Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service, the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International Settlements, and this list includes 99% of all banks, central banks, and taxing entities in the world.
There are two seals of two entities on the front of the ONE NOTE dollar?
One is the seal of the Treasury of the United States.
The other is the seal of the Federal Reserve.
Seals are used as signature for parties and entities representing more than one "live person" and are used in international commerce as signature seals.
To make a contract valid and the note enforceable in law, there must be signatures of two parties entering the contract.
Under the seal of the Federal Reserve, you can see the 'TREASURER' of the United States signed the note for the United States Treasury.
This is the treasurer's acknowledgement that the seal is accepted as legitimate.
Underneath the Treasury seal, the Secretary of the Treasury has signed, thus giving his acceptance of that being the legal seal of the Treasury.
Note: the Treasurer has accepted the Federal Reserve seal as legitimate and the Secretary of the Treasury accepted the Treasury seal.
Who does the Secretary of the Treasury work for?
THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!
The Secretary of the Treasury is NOT a lawful or constitutional position.
The constitution and laws placing the constitution into effect only provided for the Treasurer.
The Secretary of the Treasury is NOT a government, at least not a lawful occupation or position.
Does this picture become clearer?
You are exchanging your hard work for someone else's debt!
Not to worry though, you can exchange the debt at the company store and if you are fast enough the value won't change too drastically before you get there.
This is why your deposit at free minds and free money bank becomes the LIARS' asset!
You reduced HIS debt!
It's simple balance sheet bookkeeping.
Tired of this SCAM and Free minds and free money />Every congressman, senator, president, judge, governor, attorney general, IRS agent, etc.
The Rothschilds own most of the platinum on the face of the earth.
They stole it by stealing your labors.
When you buy a car there is a catalytic converter on it.
It has a small amount free minds and free money platinum inside the converter.
When the catalytic and beer money wears out, like a muffler, you have to replace it.
It costs about a hundred ONE FRN's Federal Reserve Notes - dollars?
You can get your old muffler back.
Try getting your old catalytic converter!.
They won't let you have it.
The platinum is reclaimed and sent to ROTHSCHILD owned warehouses.
You are paying for the same platinum over and over and over.
YOU never had title to the converter.
You never had title to the car!
You had a certificate of title.
If we can ever right the money wrongs being perpetrated by the reptilian LIARS, we have to stop accepting their debt notes for our labor - BEFORE their fraudulent system fails.
It's a natural end result of LIES.
The current system is overdue for failure and it has taken hook and crook to keep it sustained for this long.
We have to demand value for our labor and preserve the title to the value of our labor.
Right now we are simply selling ourselves, not just short, but for negative credits.
Real money must preserve and guarantee the true title and ownership of the labor.
If not, you are at their mercy.
Commodities are materials placed on the market for industry and it is one thousand percent controlled by the LIARS.
If you purchase gold and silver with debt notes of the Federal Reserve then THEY OWN the gold and silver you thought you purchased.
You cannot buy gold and silver 'as money.
If gold and silver is money then it must be exchanged at an exchange rate.
However, if you exchanged the trading unit of a government USD?
Nations are sovereign to themselves and they do NOT buy other money.
They exchange money on a value-based exchange rate.
If we as humans are sovereign then we must do the same when dealing with another sovereign entity.
We are NOT in the market to purchase metal for industrial use.
We MIGHT be in the market to sell to industrial needs.
Many can remember Granny saying, "I used to buy six loaves of bread for a dollar.
In 1950 the dollars were still based on silver.
In reality, the vehicle cost much less than in the 1950's, because look at how much MORE car and technical improvements you get with the SAME amount of silver.
The price and value have NOT risen.
Only the number of fraudulent debt notes being used as money.
Things of value remain virtually the same value at all times.
The only things changing are the DEBT NOTES which are controlled by the creators of the debt and the bankers free minds and free money THE LIARS' CLUB.
It's their insanity game and we have to get out of the game.
This is why it is critical to you and I to preserve title to our labor and title to what we exchange for our labor.
Paper can be 'as money'.
Debt notes can be used 'as money,' but for the humans doing all the labor it is a very dangerous game to be in.
Gold and silver are not the only things of value that can be used for money, but these metals are recognizable and are convenient for most people.
By Lauren Savage Taken from: In October 2018, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia began its prosecution of the prominent Islamic researcher, Sheikh Hassan al-Maliki, in the Specialized Criminal Court in Riyadh, which was specially established in January 2009 to handle cases of terrorism and national securi Every year, a common occurrence is a dispute between followers of various sects about when so-called Ramadan starts and ends.
This year is no exception and some countries ended their so-called Ramadan one day before others.